# Mesh Convergence for Hybrid Meshes - General Consensus?

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 30, 2023, 10:29 Mesh Convergence for Hybrid Meshes - General Consensus? #1 New Member   Mark Join Date: Nov 2023 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Hi all, Is there consensus in the CFD community about a proper approach to mesh convergence for hybrid meshes (with structured regions and unstructured regions)? For a structured mesh, the approach can be very simple, just multiplying the number of nodes in each dimension by a certain factor. For example: For a coarser mesh, halving the number of nodes in each direction, and then working with a mesh with 1/8th of the total cells compared to the original mesh (in the 3D case). For hybrid meshes it's less clear, as the unstructured regions behave differently to the structured regions. It's often not as simple as, (using the same example again): 1. Halving the number of nodes in structured regions 2. Increasing the stretching ratio in unstructured regions 3. Repeating step 2 until achieving the overall 1/8th decrease in number of cells Achieving the "1/8th" goal in step 3 can result in very very large stretching ratios for unstructured regions. (Eg. greater than 3) Is there a general consensus about what's appropriate for hybrid meshes like these? Might anyone in the community have advice or be able to share their own methods? Cheers! Mark

 November 30, 2023, 21:38 #2 Senior Member   Lucky Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Orlando, FL USA Posts: 5,676 Rep Power: 66 My advice is to just don't be lazy. It is clear what needs to be done, just do it and then be satisfied. Too often people lounge around staring at the problem and seek second opinions. Days go by. Weeks go by. Months go by and they still haven't done anything. The meshing and simulation could have all be done in a few days. There is a clear recipe in the cookbook, follow it. The maximum baking time to make bread is 30 minutes. But if you keep worrying about the best environmental conditions for making the bestbread, then you end up spending way more than 30 minutes, and you still have no bread.

 December 1, 2023, 08:58 #3 New Member   Mark Join Date: Nov 2023 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Thanks for the fast reply, Lucky! While I appreciate the encouragement and advice to stay proactive, I was hoping that my post would stimulate more specific discussions about the technical aspects of possible approaches to mesh convergence for hybrid meshes. I'm particularly interested in hearing about any practical experiences or insights people in the CFD community may have encountered when dealing with similar challenges. Cheers, Mark

 December 1, 2023, 09:10 #4 Senior Member   Lucky Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Orlando, FL USA Posts: 5,676 Rep Power: 66 Here's my practical experience. Advice is bullshit. You have a bunch of knobs you can turn. Just turn them all. Mesh them all. Run them all. And then let the data tell you answer rather than trying to get it from a magic 8 ball. People think that that halving the cell size and getting 1/8th volume reduction will yield a nice monotonic asymptotically converging plot it doesn't. Even if you have this plot... People think that the plot will tell them this is the mesh sizing you need to use. It doesn't. The convergence plot tells you a sort of numerical uncertainty you will have at each setting. The user still needs to decide how much error they are willing to deal with. Next, in my 15+ years now doing CFD, I've never seen anyone half the cell size except when I did it. I've seen tons of people start a grid convergence study, change the total cell count by a laughable 10% and call it quits. The difference between 10% and 800% is pretty much 800%. Then, a 800% change in cell count is not practical. You're never going to use a 1 million cell grid for one engineering design and then suddenly go to a 8 million cell grid. It's not even representative of the mesh sensitivity that you have when you make tweaks to your design. The halving of cell sizes is for studying the order of convergence, and most people don't give a crap about this order. Btw, it's been way more than 30 minutes already. You could have been done with the mesh sensitivity study already if you had not waited. Rather than looking for data, just generate it yourself. arjun likes this.

 December 1, 2023, 13:31 #5 Senior Member   Filippo Maria Denaro Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 6,777 Rep Power: 71 Generally, you can think something about a non-dimensional mesh ratio between the max and min volumes. A good way is described in the Ferziger, Peric, Stree textbook. 123Mark likes this.

 Tags grid convergence, hybrid grid, hybrid mesh, mesh convergence

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post [snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh/splitMeshRegion : region1 in zone "-1" GuiMagyar OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 3 August 4, 2023 12:38 Althea FLUENT 22 January 4, 2017 03:19 vitorspadetoventurin OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 November 29, 2014 03:54 aeroslacker OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 12 January 19, 2012 03:52 Remy Main CFD Forum 1 December 22, 2008 04:49

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:55.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top