|
[Sponsors] |
November 24, 2000, 13:01 |
k-epsilon model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hai,
I am working on "flow past a square cylinder" for incompressible flows using finite difference, explicit scheme. The method is based on "SOLA". For turbulent flows, I have incorporated reynolds average equations of motion, k-equation and dissipation equation in my code. I am facing some difficult when doing finite difference for turbulent viscosity and viscous terms. Because, turbulent viscosity is also variable. Which type of differencing is to be adopted central or forward differencing?. I shall be waiting for your kind reply. bye......... |
|
November 27, 2000, 06:28 |
Re: k-epsilon model
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
srinivasalu,
try both method and see which works for you better later, |
|
December 3, 2000, 08:29 |
Re: k-epsilon model
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Take care when you use central-diference and first order approximation. i) The artificial viscosity is the problem in the first order method. ii) oscilations are the problem in the central-difference. I prefer to use others high order approximation. By.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds number | qascapri | FLUENT | 0 | January 24, 2011 10:48 |
Centrifugal Pump and Turbulence Model | Michiel | CFX | 12 | January 25, 2010 03:20 |
k and epsilon discretization of RNG model | mehran | Fidelity CFD | 0 | January 24, 2009 00:01 |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 25, 2008 20:21 |
K-Epsilon Model | sangit | Main CFD Forum | 2 | September 9, 2004 13:19 |