|
[Sponsors] |
December 19, 2000, 03:03 |
Near wall k in stand k-epsilon
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have a problem understanding the modelling of the k-equation in the standard k-epsilon model with wall functions (i.e. wall functions for the mean velocity): It is said that the full k-equation is solved in the control volume adjacent to the wall, giving the k-equation a boundary condition of zero normal flux at the wall. Normally the standard k-epsilon model with wall functions is used with the cell center of the cell adjacent to the wall having a y+ value larger than say 11 or even larger. But it is found that k+ has a maximum at around y+=15 and falls steeply down when approaching the wall. Isn't this contradictory to the above mentioned solution method for the k-equation? I mean how can you allow for a maximum for a function at y+=15 when your cell center of the control volume adjacent to the wall is at say y+=20?</div> I hope the problem in understanding I am having became clear.</div> Cheers Fabian |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
natural convection | mehrdadeng | CFX | 10 | February 25, 2011 05:25 |
Tomiyama wall lubrication force | Edy | OpenFOAM | 10 | December 13, 2010 11:41 |
Influece of wall velocity in the main flow | marvin | CFX | 0 | March 22, 2008 02:05 |
Wall functions? | Pr | Main CFD Forum | 7 | April 8, 2004 06:15 |
Quick Question - Wall Function | D.Tandra | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 16, 2004 04:29 |