|
[Sponsors] |
September 7, 2001, 10:52 |
Behaviour of Numerical Schemes
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Sir,
I have a question regarding the behaviour of numerical schemes, in particular Roe's scheme for evaluating Inviscid fluxes. I have a NS-code which works for supersonic and hypersonic flows with implicit time marching (euler). I have noticed that though for High Mach numbers the residue oscillates and I have to reduce the courant number, though implicit schemes are unconditionaly stable and that it should converge for any courant/CFD number. I would like this point to be clarified. thanks, ravi. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Numerical schemes for free surface flows (VOF) | botp | OpenFOAM | 2 | March 11, 2011 15:27 |
numerical schemes | Valerio | FLUENT | 2 | July 28, 2008 04:02 |
Kinetic schemes and numerical dissipation | Praveen | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 6, 2002 07:09 |
Re: Behaviour of Numerical Schemes | Ravi B R | Main CFD Forum | 2 | September 9, 2001 04:23 |
Standard for checking and testing numerical schemes? | X. Ye | Main CFD Forum | 7 | August 31, 1999 17:05 |