|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
What are the difficulties in the computation of low Reynolds number viscous flow? Thank you in advance. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Low Reynolds number viscous flow - no problem! It's very simple!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It depends on Mach number. If M is not small (for example > 1) this problem is not "very simple!"
Alexey |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If Mach number too big -> Reynolds number not small!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If the scale of your simulation is of the order of hundreds of micro meters or less, you might have some problems with boundary conditions. For instance, no slip b.c.'s may not be valid. Especially, this problem arises when Mach number is large.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Does that not depent on weather the assumption of the fluid being a continuum holds ? ie. if we have a thin low pressure gas and small dimensions, then the eq. we normally use are not valid.
Christian |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
plz send me books on this topic and on cfd thanks
mukkarum new one in cfd |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Situation when Re is small and M is big may take place when gas is strongly rarefied. In this case either Navier-Stokes or Boltzmann equations are used depending on Knudsen number.
=Alexey |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low Reynolds Number Flow over a Flat Plate | Go | FLUENT | 4 | August 28, 2013 05:19 |
low Reynolds Model for pipe flow | RugbyGandalf | OpenFOAM | 9 | July 4, 2011 11:28 |
Flapping Airfoil Simulation in Low Reynolds Number Flow | M.Sc_Student | FLUENT | 4 | April 7, 2010 10:28 |
Combination of high and low Reynolds number | adolfo | FLUENT | 0 | June 24, 2005 13:09 |
Difficulties in solving a high Reynolds number Flow? | wowakai | Main CFD Forum | 10 | December 29, 1998 13:46 |