|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Anth
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hi, I'm comparing experimental results obtained for a NACA 0012 aerofoil in a wind tunnel with CFD results ran on Fluent.
The CFD model was a very simple 2D, steady time, incompressible model using k-epsilon and standard wall functions. BC's were a pressure inlet and outlet and symmetry on upper/lower surfaces or fluid domain. Despite the low inlet gauge pressure of 215pa, I'm getting pressure readings on the surface of the aerofoil that lead to pressure coefficients greater than +ve 1 on the pressure surface at 9 deg and 12 deg incidence. Can anyone explain why this may be happening? Is it a problem with the wall function? Thanks Anth |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Future CFD Research | Jas | Main CFD Forum | 10 | March 30, 2013 13:26 |
| DOES ASPECT RATIO PLAY A PART IN CFD RESULTS? | RIF | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 5, 2008 14:14 |
| ASME CFD Symposium | Chris Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 22, 2001 07:41 |
| CFD JOBS and Expected Salary.... | Noel Harrison | Main CFD Forum | 11 | November 22, 2000 08:15 |
| Can we quantify the fruits of CFD? | Brady Brown | Main CFD Forum | 14 | December 15, 1999 10:42 |