CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

trailing edge problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 11, 1999, 22:56
Default trailing edge problem
Kuo Wei-Jen
Posts: n/a
Hi everybody, I have a problem and need some help. As I calculated the airfoil's (NACA0012) velocity and pressure coefficient, I find that the Cp of the trailing edge can not approcach 1. or I can say that the velocity of the trailing edge can not approach zero. The Cp distribution have a large jump at the trailing edge. So, I have a question and need someone help. The question is that as you calculated the same problem, you need assign a value at the trailing edge or not. I know it must satisfied the Kutta condition. I used O-type structure grids ,finit difference method, mach no. is btw. 0.2~0.5, AOA is btw. 0~10. and full potential equation.

Thanks All
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 1999, 21:00
Default Re: trailing edge problem
Wu Chun-Kai
Posts: n/a
Hi! Wei-Jen,

1) Take a note to your far free-stream boundary conditions. If your have fixed them, release them because of the conservation of circulation around the airfoil, which is varying in process of calculation.

2) I don't think it is necessary to assign a zero velocity condition at T.E. For an airfoil with a zero cross angle at the T.E.(infinite thin)(of course, NACA0012 is not the case), the velocity at the T.E. can be determined(as an asymptotic solution) and, in general, will not be a zero. I am not sure now for the case with a finite cross angle. Maybe someone can mention about that.

3) A large difference of Cp at the trailing edge may resulted from some mistakes of your finite difference descretization at the T.E., where exists a sharp corner in your mesh and more efforts are always required.

4) I have solved the potential flow for a sinlge/multiple airfoils in free stream by using the conformal mapping method. A solution can be found in seconds. Maybe you will be interested, won't you?

  Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 1999, 11:09
Default Re: trailing edge problem
Praveen Chandrashekar
Posts: n/a
Hello Wei-Jen

I read your message when I myself was trying to solve the full potential equation. I am solving that on a structured grid with is body fitted. So the continuity equation is written in the new coordinate system. The Kutta condition is then implemented by making the derivatives of the velocity potential in the body fitted axes equal on the upper and lower ends of the trailing edge. Of course you have to put a branch cut at the trailing edge to impose the circulation. Then you will have two values of the potential at the trailing edge and along the branch cut.

I thing you should get a fairly good result by implementing the Kutta condition. For an airfoil with a non-zero trailing edge angle, the Kutta condition requires that the velocity should be zero at the trailing edge. It is important that the grid should be normal to the body surface. Otherwise, flow tangency boundary condition will not be implemented properly, which can lead to errors throughout the grid, this being an elliptic problem for subsonic flows.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] bad trailing edge boundary layer with snappyHexMesh draufunddran OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 14 March 1, 2018 10:42
trailing edge negative volumes Nick R ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 2 February 2, 2011 03:05
Actuator disk model audrich FLUENT 0 September 21, 2009 08:06
Structured mesh of a 3d sharp trailing edge Gilles Main CFD Forum 2 May 23, 2008 14:23
Through-Flow solver, Leading-Trailing edge problem Menander Main CFD Forum 0 May 14, 2008 19:14

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19.