|
[Sponsors] |
y+ suggestion for autmotive streamlined body. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 2, 2010, 05:44 |
y+ suggestion for autmotive streamlined body.
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 16 |
I have a geometry of a car with open wheels and exposed suspension.
I have meshed it using a trimmer mesh with prism layers. Reynolds number is 8.7x10^6 reference length is 4m Most of the body is streamlined though the suspension components and wheels are more bluff. Im not really sure what to do with y+ values, after one 1000 iteration run i have visulised the y+ and it ranges from mostly very small almost zero values to 1025. The high values are seen around the suspension components, and their connections to the main body. I want to capture the physics of any turbulence created by the model but i also want the detail of the boundary layer as skin friction could be very important. What y+ value range would people recommend, and which physics model is appropriate for the range. I want to use the spalart allmaras model if possible. |
|
May 2, 2010, 07:57 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 16 |
Anyone please.
|
|
May 2, 2010, 08:57 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
Rep Power: 19 |
Try to keep your y+ from 100 to 150. If you have y+ in the range 5-30 you should refine or coarsen your mesh in this region.
Do |
|
May 2, 2010, 11:03 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I dont understand why it is so wayward, the prism layers are something like 15 layers in a thickess of 0.04m = 40mm that should be right for the boundary layer on this. Also how did you come up with the range? I really need to know, is it just experience? Last edited by robinfisichella; May 2, 2010 at 17:04. |
||
May 7, 2010, 01:58 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Greg Altmann
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Luis Obispo
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
Those y+ ranges come from the wall treatment your turbulence model uses. I don't know the terminology that STAR uses, but in Fluent they say "enhanced wall treatment" or "standard wall functions". If standard wall functions are used, then you want to aim for a y+ of 120-150, with ranges of 60-250 acceptable. This is because in order for the wall function to work, it has to be in the logarithmic area of the boundary layer. If enhanced wall treatment is used, then that means that the turbulence model will resolve the entire boundary layer. Here you want most of your cells in around y+ of 1, with ranges up to 5 acceptable, because this is the laminar sublayer area of the boundary layer. Any cells in the 5-60 range is dangerous because this is in the transition area of the boundary layer.
http://www.iafr.eu/TESI/2_file/image063.jpg Hope this helps. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Body in windtunnel - high preassure behind the body? | Andyjoe | OpenFOAM | 4 | February 16, 2010 10:57 |
Body force at the cell face | Souviktor | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | March 31, 2009 08:54 |
Can't get good results on ahmed body research | Michael | Main CFD Forum | 8 | September 17, 2008 13:55 |
Inquiry, post results on airflow over auto body | Roland | CFX | 1 | July 1, 2006 14:16 |
oscillating body | fred | FLUENT | 1 | April 1, 2005 13:41 |