CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

y+ suggestion for autmotive streamlined body.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 2, 2010, 05:44
Default y+ suggestion for autmotive streamlined body.
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 16
robinfisichella is on a distinguished road
I have a geometry of a car with open wheels and exposed suspension.

I have meshed it using a trimmer mesh with prism layers.

Reynolds number is 8.7x10^6 reference length is 4m

Most of the body is streamlined though the suspension components and wheels are more bluff.

Im not really sure what to do with y+ values, after one 1000 iteration run i have visulised the y+ and it ranges from mostly very small almost zero values to 1025. The high values are seen around the suspension components, and their connections to the main body.

I want to capture the physics of any turbulence created by the model but i also want the detail of the boundary layer as skin friction could be very important. What y+ value range would people recommend, and which physics model is appropriate for the range.

I want to use the spalart allmaras model if possible.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg untitled.JPG (83.2 KB, 30 views)
robinfisichella is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2010, 07:57
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 16
robinfisichella is on a distinguished road
Anyone please.
robinfisichella is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2010, 08:57
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
Rep Power: 19
DoHander is on a distinguished road
Try to keep your y+ from 100 to 150. If you have y+ in the range 5-30 you should refine or coarsen your mesh in this region.

Do
DoHander is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2010, 11:03
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 16
robinfisichella is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoHander View Post
Try to keep your y+ from 100 to 150. If you have y+ in the range 5-30 you should refine or coarsen your mesh in this region.

Do
Thanks, as you can see on my jpeg the y+ is well beyond that range and much smaller in some cases as well!

I dont understand why it is so wayward, the prism layers are something like 15 layers in a thickess of 0.04m = 40mm that should be right for the boundary layer on this.

Also how did you come up with the range? I really need to know, is it just experience?

Last edited by robinfisichella; May 2, 2010 at 17:04.
robinfisichella is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 7, 2010, 01:58
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Greg Altmann
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Luis Obispo
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16
galtmann is on a distinguished road
Those y+ ranges come from the wall treatment your turbulence model uses. I don't know the terminology that STAR uses, but in Fluent they say "enhanced wall treatment" or "standard wall functions". If standard wall functions are used, then you want to aim for a y+ of 120-150, with ranges of 60-250 acceptable. This is because in order for the wall function to work, it has to be in the logarithmic area of the boundary layer. If enhanced wall treatment is used, then that means that the turbulence model will resolve the entire boundary layer. Here you want most of your cells in around y+ of 1, with ranges up to 5 acceptable, because this is the laminar sublayer area of the boundary layer. Any cells in the 5-60 range is dangerous because this is in the transition area of the boundary layer.

http://www.iafr.eu/TESI/2_file/image063.jpg

Hope this helps.
galtmann is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Body in windtunnel - high preassure behind the body? Andyjoe OpenFOAM 4 February 16, 2010 10:57
Body force at the cell face Souviktor Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 March 31, 2009 08:54
Can't get good results on ahmed body research Michael Main CFD Forum 8 September 17, 2008 13:55
Inquiry, post results on airflow over auto body Roland CFX 1 July 1, 2006 14:16
oscillating body fred FLUENT 1 April 1, 2005 13:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43.