CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

a very basic question regarding Re

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   April 18, 2011, 17:13
Default a very basic question regarding Re
  #1
Senior Member
 
Hassan
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 106
Rep Power: 17
HaKu is on a distinguished road
i want to ask that whether it is possible or not:

An author has compared his numerical results of water with the experimental results of air...

[the experimental results are not non dimensional results as on y-axis the units are mm and on the x-axis the units of velcoity cm/s are there]

Now suppose the author has used the non dimensional form of incompressible Navier stokes equations so we have 1/Re on the RHS of NS.

So if he keeps the dimensions of the experimental set up in his numerical study, can he get the same velcoity profile with water to that of the experimental profiles of air??

The author has not clearly mentioned that whom he is comparing his results to...so thats why im confused.. may be he is validating air to air just to see whether code works and afterwards focusing on the water that is his area of focus..
HaKu is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Basic question to buoyantBoussinesqPisoFoam kriz OpenFOAM 2 June 12, 2010 03:35
Basic Question Abhi FLUENT 1 August 4, 2007 08:07
Basic question: UDF for wall heat flux Carl FLUENT 1 August 5, 2006 19:01
A Basic Question on ducted Flows! CFD User Main CFD Forum 4 January 8, 2005 06:17
LES..Basic Question NIK Main CFD Forum 13 May 19, 2004 19:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39.