|
[Sponsors] |
June 9, 2005, 14:21 |
Detached Eddy Simulation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all
I am using the Detached Eddy Simulation model for predicting the three-dimensional flow field of a round jet in crossflow. The velocity range is from 15-20 m/s and the domain dimensions are 0.75x0.3x0.3 m. I am using a relatively coarse grid of about 90000 nodes, because the simulation is done on a PC. The unsteady parameters that I have used are: Time Step Size: 0.0001 No. of Time Steps: 1000 No. of Iterations per Time Step: 20 I have compared the mean results of the DES and results from steady RANS based simulation using standard k-epsilon model against experimental data, and I found that the steady k-epsilon simulation results are slightly in better agreement with the measurements; however both methods highly over-predicted the velocity profiles (with an error of about 250% for the wall-normal velocity). I would like to know, whether this model (DES) is appropriate for my case and could I get better results by using smaller time step? Thanks a lot. Maged |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
domain size for Detached Eddy Simulation | T | FLUENT | 0 | November 6, 2007 12:23 |
Detached Eddy Simulation in industry | Fab | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 18, 2007 14:50 |
Large eddy simulation | David | FLUENT | 1 | December 11, 2006 12:18 |
Detached Eddy Simulation | Juan Guevara | CFX | 3 | December 21, 2005 14:47 |
Large Eddy simulation | Andreas Hauser | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 20, 2000 20:33 |