|
[Sponsors] |
July 6, 2005, 23:30 |
Time to reach steady state for cavity flow?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I've been testing my NS code for different Re of cavity flow. My range is from 100 to 10000 (as Ghia's) Since mine is a transient solver, I'm not sure when I should stop. It seems that as Re increase, the non-dimensional time to reach steady state also increases. Is that so? Is there any recommended time for different values of Re? Also, my u,v results compared to Ghia's is about 5% difference. Is that acceptable? I'm using a 2nd order projection mtd. Thanks alot! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solver for transonic flow? | Martin Hegedus | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 22 | December 16, 2015 04:59 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 15:33 |
Steady state vs. mean transient analysis of flow behind a circular cylinder | Heini | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 9, 2011 06:47 |
time step and iterations in steady state problem using transient solver | jing113cn | FLUENT | 2 | January 15, 2010 03:18 |
initialize flow field with steady state solution | holg | FLUENT | 0 | July 13, 2009 17:10 |