
[Sponsors] 
April 16, 2012, 13:11 
SIMPLE algorithm for twophase

#1 
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 7 
Sponsored Links


Sponsored Links 
April 17, 2012, 09:22 

#2 
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 7 
To form the pressure correction equation, I considered total volume continuity, so that I only have one continuity equation. In other words, I consider all mass convection into the cell, be it vapor or liquid, and the change in total mass over time (meaning change in vapor AND liquid mass). If you consider total volume, there is no source term due to evaporation or condensation. This allowed me to form the pressure correction equation. I use density and void fraction explicit from the last iteration to form the pressure correction. This allows me to correct the pressure field and the velocity field, but now I need to solve for the remaining dependent variables, which are the void fraction and the phase enthalpies. I'm stuck here because I can see that I have 2 energy equations and 2 continuity equations. However, I only have 3 dependent variables  void, liquid enthalpy, and vapor enthalpy. So it seems like an overdefined problem to me.
I picked up a paper from the 2000 Proceedings of the ASME Fluids Engineering Division, Summer Meeting, entitled "A Phase Coupled Method for Solving Multiphase Problems on Unstructured Meshes", which explains an algorithm, PCSIMPLE (phasecoupled SIMPLE). It confirms my use of total volume continuity to form the pressure correction equation, but I'm still at a loss on how I should now get my void fraction and enthalpies out of the remaining conservation equations. 

April 17, 2012, 11:53 

#3 
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 7 
My searching has lead me to a paper by Oliveira and Issa, "Numerical aspects of an algorithm for the Eulerian Simulation of TwoPhase Flows". It discusses two methods for handling the "overdefinition" that I discussed. The first method is to solve just one of the continuity equations using the updated (corrected) velocities and then simply use (1\alpha) to get the void fraction of the other phase that the continuity equation was not solved for. The second method is to solve both equations, but for two new, introduced variables \alpha_l* and \alpha_v*, which are preliminary void fractions for liquid and vapor phases. The actual liquid and vapor voids are then obtained using a correction factor, f, as follows:
\alpha_l = f x \alpha_l* \alpha_v = f x \alpha_v* The f correction factor is defined as f = 1/(\alpha_l* + \alpha_v*). This allows the physics of both phases to be captured, but also ensures that the void fractions add up to 1 at each iteration. When convergence of the solution is achieved, f should be equal to 1. 

April 20, 2012, 05:45 

#4 
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 271
Rep Power: 9 
Yes what you mention is a very tricky problem !!! and papers on this topic are very rare.
Especially when you deal with 3 different phases.. Check the serie of papers from Darwish and Moukalled. They have proposed several approaches to deal with such problem Good luck ;) 

April 20, 2012, 09:02 

#5 
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 7 
I looked up some of their papers and they look like they're right along the lines of what I was looking for. Thanks for the suggestion.


Tags 
simple algorithm, twophase flow 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Velocity correction and underrelaxation in the SIMPLE algorithm  johnhelt  Main CFD Forum  2  October 18, 2010 06:27 
SIMPLE algorithm confusion  lost.identity  Main CFD Forum  1  October 7, 2010 11:48 
help me with SIMPLE algorithm!  peck110  Main CFD Forum  1  January 30, 2008 14:45 
compressible two phase flow in CFX4.4  youngan  CFX  0  July 1, 2003 23:32 
SIMPLE algorithm  Jonathan Castro  Main CFD Forum  3  December 10, 1999 05:59 
Sponsored Links 