CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Bugs

Serial vs parallel different results

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 30, 2008, 11:54
Default Dear Foamers, we found very
  #1
Member
 
Luca M.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Luzern, Switzerland
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 17
luca is on a distinguished road
Dear Foamers,

we found very strange behavior in solving purely conductive heat transfer in parallel using tetrahedral mesh in version 1.4.1.
We were able to reproduce the error in a simple case named flate plate.
The case is composed by two separate region one of which is tetrahedral and the other hexahedral. The simulation is only conductive in a steady manner and represents the 1-D conduction between two surfaces at fixed temperature. So isolines in the two region should be almost aligned. While in the serial simulation the results are ok the solution of the parallel simulation is influenced by the number of partition in the tetrahedral domain. No matter what gradient scheme was used.

Some picture can explain better the phenomenon

Serial Temperature contour


Parallel Temperature contour


Mesh detail around processor patch and Temperature contour



As we can see from figure the tetrahedral region for the parallel run has not the same isolines temperature like in the serial simulation.
The conductions is pure steady simulation (only laplacian) and the resudual are of the order of 1.e-10, so we believe it is not a convergence problem.

we have uplodaded also the case at flate plate case

Regards

Lu & Co
luca is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2008, 12:46
Default Sorry guys for warning you abo
  #2
Member
 
Luca M.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Luzern, Switzerland
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 17
luca is on a distinguished road
Sorry guys for warning you about something we just discovered was not a bug. It was simply the value of the diffusivity on the processor patch that was a wrong one.

Anyhow sometimes the forum is helpful also for this: you spend time searching for a difficult answer but at the end the bug is right in front of your nose but you see it only when you post the question.

Sorry again for this half-an-hour lasting alarm,
Luca & Cosimo
luca is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2008, 11:12
Default Hallo Luca M., I also have
  #3
Senior Member
 
Wolfgang Heydlauff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 21
wolle1982 will become famous soon enough
Hallo Luca M.,

I also have the problem, that parallel running cases are instable and the results are kind of wrong. Please explain what you mean by "diffusivity of the processor patch" and how to change it right.


Greetings,
Wolfgang
wolle1982 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Differences solutions in Parallel and Serial wizard1301 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 January 30, 2009 06:38
More DPM incompletes in parallel than in serial Paul FLUENT 0 December 16, 2008 10:27
Problem with Parallel not with Serial iyer_arvind OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 September 18, 2006 07:03
Serial run OK parallel one fails r2d2 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 November 16, 2005 13:44
parallel Vs. serial co2 FLUENT 1 December 31, 2003 03:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20.