|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Chris Beck
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Hello,
There seems to be an issue with the implementation of the Guelders flame speed correlation. The issue affects simulations where there is a pure fuel and pure oxidizer inlet. The Problem can be reproduced with the Xoodles solver and the Pitz and Daily 3D test case. To break it set: thermoType hhuMixtureThermo<inhomogeneousMixture<sutherlandTr ansport<specieThermo<janafThermo<perfectGas>>>>>; and in 0/ft internalField uniform 0.05; boundaryField { inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 1.0; } ....... then start a reacting simulation. First time the Guelders correlation is called the code breaks. Version: 1.5.x, 11/2008 regards, Christian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 854
Rep Power: 23 ![]() |
Now fixed in 1.5.x.
H |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Gulderbs Coefficients for laminar flame speed correlation | ali | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | August 20, 2024 04:21 |
| Flame speed. | John. | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 31, 2005 13:57 |
| Laminar Flame Speed | Mahbub | Siemens | 0 | March 22, 2004 19:38 |
| Laminar Flame Speed | Mahbub | Siemens | 0 | February 23, 2004 13:34 |
| correlation for laminar flame speed | cfd-user | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 28, 2003 08:27 |