|
[Sponsors] |
Pedrolli et al. - Comparison of CFD-DEM and MP-PIC in the Simulation of Metal Powder |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 9, 2024, 14:31 |
Pedrolli et al. - Comparison of CFD-DEM and MP-PIC in the Simulation of Metal Powder
|
#1 |
New Member
Miguel Nóbrega
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 14 |
Comments and questions are welcomed on the article Pedrolli et al. - Comparison of CFD-DEM and MP-PIC in the Simulation of Metal Powder , February 2024, OpenFOAM Journal, https://doi.org/10.51560/ofj.v4.91
|
|
August 19, 2024, 23:40 |
Fesibility of using OpenFoam to conduct One-way coupling steady flow simulations
|
#2 |
New Member
Meng Huqi
Join Date: Aug 2024
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 2 |
Dear sir:
Recently, I'm considering to use openFoam to conduct the one-way coupling steady flow simulation using OpenFOAM. Supposing that only buoyant force is required to be considered, is that feasible? My case is the steady turbulent flow (calculated using simpleFoam).....In the past, I would use fluent to calculate and obtain the date of flow. And then export this data to the EDEM (then just leave CFD calculation aside)to calculate the particles' motions.. |
|
September 11, 2024, 09:51 |
OpenFoam to conduct One-way coupling steady flow simulations
|
#3 |
New Member
Lorenzo Pedrolli
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4 |
Hello Huqimeng,
OpenFoam is very capable of handling one-way coupling. The implementation of DEM-type particles is maybe less efficient than dedicated codes, but useful nonetheless. I don't remember specifically whether buoyancy is already implemented, but you can: 1) check the code / documentation https://develop.openfoam.com/Develop...ParticleForces2) implement the buoyancy model based on the other particle force models |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|