CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Journal

Montella et al. - 2024 -Implementing moving object capability in a two-phase ...

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By hani
  • 1 Post By eduard.puig.montella

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 22, 2024, 02:52
Default Montella et al. - 2024 -Implementing moving object capability in a two-phase ...
  #1
Senior Member
 
Håkan Nilsson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 205
Rep Power: 19
hani is on a distinguished road
Comments and questions are welcomed on the article Montella et al., Implementing moving object capability in a two-phase Eulerian model for sediment transport applications, OpenFOAM Journal, 22 April 2024, https://doi.org/10.51560/ofj.v4.119.
cyss38 likes this.
hani is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 22, 2024, 07:11
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Eduard Puig Montella
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
eduard.puig.montella is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone! I am one of the authors of this article, and I'd be happy to answer any questions related to this work
eduard.puig.montella is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2025, 02:44
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Griffin Collins
Join Date: Oct 2024
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
griffincollins11 is on a distinguished road
thank you for offering to answer questions. I'm curious about the specific numerical methods used for the moving object implementation. Did you encounter any challenges with stability or convergence, especially with complex geometries or high velocities? slope
griffincollins11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2025, 04:50
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Eduard Puig Montella
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
eduard.puig.montella is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your interest in the work. Regarding the numerical technique for handling the motion of the object, we used overset and morphing mesh approaches without modifications, so there are no novel developments in that aspect. However, if you have specific questions on the numerical method, I’d be happy to answer them.


The main challenge we encountered is not strictly related to complex geometries or high velocities but rather to rapid changes in sediment concentration. Since the solid pressure is computed based on sediment concentration, a fast-moving object compressing a dense granular region can cause an unrealistic buildup of solid pressure. This, in turn, affects the forces exerted on the moving object. However, this issue is mainly relevant for fast-moving objects in dense granular matter, and one can try to mitigate them reducing the time step. Let me know if you’d like further details!
cyss38 likes this.
eduard.puig.montella is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[swak4Foam] mass conservation of solid phase violated when using groovyBC with twoPhaseEulerFoam xpqiu OpenFOAM Community Contributions 8 June 17, 2015 03:08
BC for object moving in water maply007 COMSOL 6 March 20, 2010 05:41
Modeling flow over a moving object psd Main CFD Forum 3 October 21, 2009 08:46
Moving mesh capability in CCM+ RGB Siemens 6 May 17, 2008 17:46
A moving object within a chamber Whitaker FLUENT 5 October 10, 2000 23:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:19.