 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
[snappyHexMesh] Differences between FoamJob and mpirun |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 17, 2018, 19:09
|
Differences between FoamJob and mpirun
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Basile
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0  |
Hi,
I m a student in cfd and new in this forum. Those last weeks, I have tried to handle Open Foam in order to run a submarine simulation. For that purpose I use snappyHex and found out that I could use both mpirun or foamjob to run my case in parallel. I ve made some research on google and in the forum but I can t really understand what are the differences and benefits by using one or the other ? Actually, I don t really understand what are mpirun and foamjob for OPenFoam... Hope you can help me, thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| foamjob, mpirun, parallel |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mpirun problems: exited on signal 11 (segmentation fault) | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | March 30, 2023 12:53 |
| Cannot read decomposeParDict during mpirun | MikeC | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | June 30, 2022 14:59 |
| [snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh in parallel | shailesh.nitk | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 33 | January 25, 2022 10:35 |
| MPIrun Problem with FoamJob Workaround | kaszt | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 4, 2018 12:55 |
| [Other] openFoam 2.3.x for windows from cfdsupport.com | vasava | OpenFOAM Installation | 44 | May 18, 2016 05:09 |
Linear Mode
