CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion

[snappyHexMesh] Layers Damaging Initially Well Snapped Edges

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By HPE
  • 1 Post By HPE

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   May 8, 2020, 12:02
Default Layers Damaging Initially Well Snapped Edges
  #1
Member
 
Conor Crickmore
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Leicestershire, United Kingdom
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 6
cjc96 is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,
In what seems to be a rite of passage for OpenFOAM and snappyHexMesh I am currently having an argument with prism layers.

I see a lot of problems relating to layers not fully covering sharp edges, but I've yet to find an example of my own problem, where the layers are seemingly pulling the initially well-snapped mesh away from the surface. I'm not really sure how best to explain it, so I've included a few images.

Here you can see the mesh without layer addition, with the cells well snapped to the surface of the .stl representing my domain. I know such a domain could be made using blockMesh, but I was experiencing some other issues using that method so am attempting this as an alternative.

Here you can see the result following the addition of prism layers. You can see that where there was original a sharp corner, a tapered edge has been produces, and downstream, a large number of malformed cells are visible on the lower edges.

Due to the pandemic I am working from home which is significantly increasing the time required to produce each mesh. I have been playing around with the settings in both 'snapControls' and 'addLayerControls', most notably the smoothing operations and primary iteration settings (including 'nFeatureSnapIter') but to no avail.

As a slight aside, one of the problems I was facing when using blockMesh to explicitly define my domain was that my prism layers were 'bulging' across the faces of the domain and 'compressing' (but not collapsing) towards the edges. I think it is to do with the fact that the domain has a slight divergence in width across its length, but had no luck counteracting that either.

I hope everyone is staying safe in these crazy times, and would me immensely grateful if any of the snappy wizards out there could shed some light on these issues.
__________________
Conor Crickmore
PhD Researcher in Automotive Aerodynamics
Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering
Loughborough University
LE11 3TU
cjc96 is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh sticking point natty_king OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 11 February 20, 2024 09:12
[snappyHexMesh] Help with Snappy: no layers growing GianF OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 September 23, 2020 08:26
SimpleFoam & Theater jipai OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 June 18, 2019 10:11
[snappyHexMesh] sHM layer process keeps getting killed MBttR OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 4 August 15, 2016 03:21
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 6 August 26, 2015 09:38


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:59.