[snappyHexMesh] Cfmesh vs snappyHexMesh

harsha_kulkarni · August 29, 2020, 07:51

Hello friends,
Which one is better meshing method
snappyHexMesh or cfmesh

simrego · September 6, 2020, 05:19

Hi!

Both better than the other but differently.

cfMesh: Easy to use, really fast, easy BL insertion.
sHM: a bit harder to use, much more freedom, much more functionalities.

For a simple case I think cfMesh is the way to go. Easy to use, and really fast. Also it produces good quality meshes and you don't have to deal with the background mesh like in snappy.
If you have some more complex domain (multiple regions, baffles, etc), I think you should go with sHM.

(At least this is how I see the two mesher, but cfMesh has a non-free version (cfMesh+) which has some more functionalities but I have no experience with it.)

bikooo3878 · November 30, 2020, 14:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by simrego

Hi!

Both better than the other but differently.

cfMesh: Easy to use, really fast, easy BL insertion.
sHM: a bit harder to use, much more freedom, much more functionalities.

For a simple case I think cfMesh is the way to go. Easy to use, and really fast. Also it produces good quality meshes and you don't have to deal with the background mesh like in snappy.
If you have some more complex domain (multiple regions, baffles, etc), I think you should go with sHM.

(At least this is how I see the two mesher, but cfMesh has a non-free version (cfMesh+) which has some more functionalities but I have no experience with it.)

This answer is exactly what I was looking for

thank you

August 29, 2020, 07:51	Cfmesh vs snappyHexMesh	#1
harsha_kulkarni Senior Member harshawardhank Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 209 Rep Power: 13	Hello friends, Which one is better meshing method snappyHexMesh or cfmesh fumiya and Reptider like this.

September 6, 2020, 05:19		#2
simrego Senior Member anonymous Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 416 Rep Power: 14	Hi! Both better than the other but differently. cfMesh: Easy to use, really fast, easy BL insertion. sHM: a bit harder to use, much more freedom, much more functionalities. For a simple case I think cfMesh is the way to go. Easy to use, and really fast. Also it produces good quality meshes and you don't have to deal with the background mesh like in snappy. If you have some more complex domain (multiple regions, baffles, etc), I think you should go with sHM. (At least this is how I see the two mesher, but cfMesh has a non-free version (cfMesh+) which has some more functionalities but I have no experience with it.) Kummi, thomas.zhang and BIRAJ like this.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[CAD formats] Creating waterproof STL using snappyHexMesh or salome	Tobi	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	58	May 13, 2020 06:01
[cfMesh] How to start using cfMesh with OpenFOAM v1706?	Carno	OpenFOAM Community Contributions	1	November 1, 2018 16:28
[snappyHexMesh] Running snappyHexMesh in parallel - optimizing	peterhess	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	2	January 3, 2018 02:54
[snappyHexMesh] Tutorial crashes: snappyHexMesh floating point exception.	jasv	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	4	May 10, 2016 02:55
[snappyHexMesh] stitchMesh and snappyHexMesh	gdbaldw	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	0	December 23, 2009 02:09