CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Post-Processing

mesh quality checking for large internal flow (yStar)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 21, 2014, 08:49
Default mesh quality checking for large internal flow (yStar)
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 213
Rep Power: 17
vaina74 is on a distinguished road
Hi foamers, I'm working on a large internal flow case. I'm walking step by step on preliminary models: a simplified geometry, no account for temperature and so on. I've adopted the simpleFoam solver and the \epsilon-k model with near-wall treatment. I'd like to check the quality of my mesh, so I'm back to the very old and debated question about y+ and y*. I've been far from OpenFOAM in the last two years, maybe I'm not updated about last changes and enhancements.

1. I set the nutkWallFunction. In the nutkWallFunctionFvPatchScalarField.C file I read
yPlus = Cmu25*y[faceI]*sqrt(k[faceCellI])/nuw[faceI]
and that defines y*.

2. The yPlusRAS utility outputs the min, max and average y* value on the wall patches.

3. y* is different from y+, but in the inner boundary layer log-law region they are similar and I can use the standard OpenFOAM utility.

4. Anyway, I read from FLUENT Theory Guide that
The lower limit always lies in the order of y*~15. Below this limit, wall functions will typically deteriorate and the accuracy of the solutions cannot be maintained. The upper limit depends strongly on the Reynolds number. For very high Reynolds numbers (for example, ship, airplanes), the logarithmic layer can extend to values as high as several thousands, whereas for low Reynolds number flows (for example, turbine blades, etc.) the upper limit can be as small as 100. For these low Reynolds number flows, the entire boundary layers is frequently only of the order of a few hundred y* units.
I wonder - is there any experienced user in large internal flow? - if the y* range of my simulation is good enough. I'm analyzing the air flow and pressure distribution in a large geometry, including a ship engine room with funnel and other connected space (the blockMesh background mesh is about 30 m x 25 m x 30 m). I must meet the meshing requirements and my hardware configuration limit and I obtained a 4-4.5M cells mesh with
Patch 12 named domain y+ : min: 22.09039 max: 657.0444 average: 197.6188
In your opinion, is the mesh good enough?

Thanks for sharing your experience.
vaina74 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery dowlee OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 August 6, 2021 07:40
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 6 August 26, 2015 10:38
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh Internal Flow Example (Diesel Injector) Irish09 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 23 July 15, 2013 08:45
Polyhedral Mesh Quality in Star-CCM+ niazaliahmed STAR-CCM+ 3 March 8, 2012 14:51
[ICEM] Tetra mesh quality before and after prism layer Chander ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 December 25, 2011 23:04

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:19.