|
[Sponsors] |
Difference between wall and patch boundaries for inviscid flow |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 26, 2017, 06:50 |
Difference between wall and patch boundaries for inviscid flow
|
#1 |
New Member
Jim
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
Is there a difference between the wall and patch boundaries when considering inviscid flow (i.e. mu=0, slip at walls for velocity, no turbulence model)? Would I be right to say that the wall and patch types have the same effect under these conditions? To test this I ran the pitzDaily case using rhoPimpleFoam, with mu=0, slip at the "wall" for velocity, and no turbulence model. This was ran separately with patch and wall boundaries for the "wall". I could not see any difference between the two, where comparing the pressure and velocity contours. However, I am not sure whether this will be the case in other scenarios. Thanks |
|
April 26, 2017, 07:18 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15 |
You need the wall boundary only if you want to use wall functions.
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
April 26, 2017, 07:23 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Jim
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 12 |
||
Tags |
boundary condition, inviscid flow, patches, wall boundary condition |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
y+ and u+ values with low-Re RANS turbulence models: utility + testcase | florian_krause | OpenFOAM | 114 | August 23, 2023 06:37 |
[Commercial meshers] Fluent3DMeshToFoam | simvun | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 50 | January 19, 2020 16:33 |
Near wall treatment in k-omega SST | Arnoldinho | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 38 | March 8, 2017 14:48 |
Possible Bug in pimpleFoam (or createPatch) (or fluent3DMeshToFoam) | cfdonline2mohsen | OpenFOAM | 3 | October 21, 2013 10:28 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |