
[Sponsors] 
October 28, 2010, 10:50 
calculation of k, epsilon and omega

#1 
New Member
Philipp Bachmann
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 
Sponsored Links
Could somebody give me a advice, how I can calculate k (turbulent kinematic energy) and epsilon (dissipation rate) on every boundary for my kepsilonmodel. And the calculation of epsilon, k and omega for my kwSSTModel. Do I need also nuTilda for the kwSSTModel? If someone can help me, I would be very happy. Thank you in advance. phil 

Sponsored Links 
October 28, 2010, 12:02 

#2 
Member
Simon Lapointe
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Québec, Qc, Canada
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 10 
Hi,
At the inlet, the values of k and epsilon can be calculated using the level of turbulence intensity and viscosity ratio (or turbulent length scale) you want to achieve. The relations found on this page can be useful: http://www.cfdonline.com/Wiki/Turbu...ary_conditions On wall boundary conditions, you use kqRWallFunction and epsilonWallFunction since the kepsilon model makes use of wall functions. For the kw SST model, you need to specify BCs for k and omega, not epsilon nor nuTilda. Hope this helps. 

November 4, 2010, 15:50 

#3 
New Member
Philipp Bachmann
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 
Hi Simon,
thank you very much! Now I could calculate epsilon, k and omega. This was one of my main problems. You don´t know, how you helped me with that information :). Also for these three variables I found some functions: turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet for k in the inlet (under that you make the description of the intensity and the value) turbulentMixingLengthFrequencyInlet for omega in the inlet (then description mixing length, k and value) turbulentMixingLengthDissipationRateInlet for epsilon in the inlet (then description mixing length and value) ...like that for example k inlet { type turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet; intensity 0.02; value uniform 0.0006; } But relating to the wallfunctions I need a little bit more support, please. I´m really sorry.  For the kepsilonmodel I can use kqRWallFunction for k and for epsilon I can use epsilonWallFunction? like that? [k] wall { type kqRWallFunction; value uniform ...; }  Are there more wallfunctions for the komegaSST model?  what can I use for the outlet?  what means type zerogradient? The variabel will not change in that boundary? Thank you in Advance phil 

November 9, 2010, 10:33 

#4 
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 
Hi Philipp,
as far as I know you can use kqRWallFunction for k, epsilonWallFunction for epsilon and omegaWallFunction for omega. Furthermore there are Wall Functions for nut (implying that you want to do incompressible calculations), such as nutWallFunction or nutSpalartAllmarasWallFunction. Have a look at the code in your Openfoam directory /src/turbulenceModels/incompressible/RAS/derivedFvPatchFields/wallFunctions for details and further wall functions. If you want to use kOmegaSST it is clear that you need to specify omega instead of epsilon. I hope this helps a little bit. I am afraid, but I am new both to CFD in general and to OpenFoam in particular. Hi everybody, as I just mentioned, I'm new to CFD and OpenFoam. So I hope it is not to annoying to ask you a simple question: the value specified for a wall function, should it be the value at the wall (k=0,...) or at the first grid point let's say at 40 y+? Thanks. Gerard 

November 9, 2010, 11:10 

#5  
Senior Member
Vesselin Krastev
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: University of Tor Vergata, Rome
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 12 
Quote:
Hope this helps V. 

November 9, 2010, 11:41 

#6 
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 
Hi Vesselin,
thank you for your reply! Do I get you right, that the values specified for the wall functions are initial values and not "classical boundary conditions", that need to be fulfilled within every time step? So theoretically it would be desirable to set it to the estimated value of the first grid point next to the wall? At the moment I just define uniform values for the internal field Thanks again. Gerard 

November 9, 2010, 11:53 

#7  
Senior Member
Vesselin Krastev
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: University of Tor Vergata, Rome
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 12 
Quote:
Quote:
Best regards V. 

November 9, 2010, 12:23 

#8 
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 
Thank you very much! That really helped me.
Best regards Gerard 

November 25, 2010, 12:02 

#9 
New Member
Philipp Bachmann
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 
Thanks to all,
my calculation did run now. You were a great help. Thanks a lot. phil 

January 17, 2011, 18:51 

#10 
Member
Vishal Jambhekar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: University Stuttgart, Stuttgart Germany
Posts: 90
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 10 
Hi,
I have some same problem please have a look at following post... http://www.cfdonline.com/Forums/ope...urbulence.html
__________________
Cheers, Vishal Jambhekar... "Simulate the way ahead......!!!" 

March 9, 2011, 13:52 

#11 
Member
José
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 8 
Dear all,
while solving one case of flow over an airfoil with the turbulence model komega SST I would like to compute the values of omega at the wall. In OpenFOAM it seems that you can only call it as a "fixedValue", not as "calculated". I tried to call the wall as a "patch" instead of a "wall" and it does not work either. I get the following error: gradientInternalCoeffs cannot be called for a calculatedFvPatchField on patch blabla of field omega in file "/.../omega" You are probably trying to solve for a field with a default boundary condition. The reason why I want to set it as "calculated" is because I have run the same case in ANSYS CFX and I saw that it gave different values for this omega at the wall. Thus, by fixing it, maybe it is affecting to the results obtained. Thank you very much for your help, Regards, José 

March 9, 2011, 18:19 

#12 
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 
Hi José,
I'm not sure because I have just used OF for a few months now, but maybe you use an older version of OF which automatically applies wallfunctions to omega with SST? Did you check that? Gerard 

October 19, 2011, 03:10 

#13 
New Member

Hey everyone,
I have a query regarding Kepsilon values too. I am using a transient compressible rhoPimpleFoam solver, RAS turbulence model but without any wall functions for k and epsilon. Whatever I read in various threads on this forum, I understand that initial values of internal fields of k & epsilon are independent of the solution. But however in my case, if I use different values my solution behaviour and values change. Can anyone please comment on that? I had written on another thread too, but no one replied regarding specific k & epsilon intial values for internal field. I am not using a velocity boundary condition, rather pressure difference. Thanks, I will really appreciate some advice. 

October 19, 2011, 05:20 

#14  
Senior Member
Roman Thiele
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 14 
Quote:
If you use wall function less RANS models (RAS in OF) then you need to check with the turbulence model which boundary conditions it suggests for k and epsilon. those models usually require also that the first cell is within y+ < 1.
__________________
~roman 

October 19, 2011, 05:23 

#15 
New Member

First of all thanks for your reply Roman.
But how do I check y+ values in OF when I am not using any wall functions. According to my knowledge, the yPlusRAS utility in OF only gives y+ values when wall functions are being used. Not without them. Correct me if I am wrong, as I am only new to this. 

October 19, 2011, 05:30 

#16 
Senior Member
Roman Thiele
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 14 
you can check with this thread
http://www.cfdonline.com/Forums/ope...testcase.html where somebody has posted a tool in order to calculate the y+ values for low reynolds number models which do not use wall functions.
__________________
~roman 

October 19, 2011, 05:33 

#17 
New Member

Roman
Thanks, for the link. I will just have a look at it. 

October 19, 2011, 05:37 
One Last Thing

#18 
New Member

And Roman, please comment on this last thing before I check the y+ code.
The thing is the documentations I have read about OpenFOAM and in the threads here, for kepsilon model to calculate the initial values of k and epsilon, I need mean flow velocity and a turbulent length scale. k= 3/2*(UI)^2 or k = 1/2 U'.U' I can determine the turbulent length scale based on my geometry. But I do not know the mean flow velocity, because I am generating flow based on pressure difference. The initial velocity everywhere in the model is zero at time zero. The initial conditions I mean. So I was wondering just for that initial values in my 0 folder, how do I determine the k and epsilon value based on these relations given for my internal field and outlet, even before I run my solution. Thanks. 

October 19, 2011, 05:39 

#19 
Senior Member
Roman Thiele
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 14 
I would use an estimate of the mean flow velocity and then run the simulation once. you then will see what your velocity becomes. you can then also see your k values and epsilon values, which can then be used as your inlet conditions.
__________________
~roman 

October 19, 2011, 05:42 

#20 
New Member

Okay thanks again for the help, appreciate it. I'll just do that.


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Bounding epsilon or bounding omega  Stylianos  OpenFOAM  7  February 26, 2017 00:17 
boundary conditions for simpleFoam calculation  foam_noob  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  8  July 1, 2015 08:07 
Help with k epsilon values of turbulence  vw.cfd  OpenFOAM  17  December 12, 2013 06:57 
Use of k omega turbulence model  john_w  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  2  September 22, 2009 05:15 
Values of k & epsilon in the moving wall  ghlee  Main CFD Forum  1  August 16, 1999 12:42 
Sponsored Links 