|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Turbulent frequency equation for compressible kOmegaSST turbulence model (F1) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Bojan Sekutkovski
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hi,
According to the kOmegaSST.C file (line 470), turbulent frequency equation term is: fvm::SuSp ( rho_*(F1 - scalar(1))*CDkOmega/omega_, omega_ ) but in the following source papers as described in kOmegaSST.H file: 1. Menter, F., Esch, T. "Elements of Industrial Heat Transfer Prediction" 16th Brazilian Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM), Nov. 2001 and 2. Hellsten, A. "Some Improvements in Menter’s k-omega-SST turbulence model" 29th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA-98-2554, June 1998. there is a member (scalar(1) - F1) which doesn't look like in the kOmegaSST.C file. Does it have to be treated like bug, or something else...? Regards! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Bojan Sekutkovski
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Sorry people, I haven't seen that there is an "minus" sign in "omega" equation, so F1 and scalar(1) change their places.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| f1 function, komegasst, omega, omega equation |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model | FelixL | OpenFOAM Bugs | 27 | March 27, 2012 10:02 |
| error message | cuteapathy | CFX | 14 | March 20, 2012 07:45 |
| Zero equation turbulence model gives better result?? | Sanyo | CFX | 10 | June 26, 2011 11:58 |
| Low Reynolds k-epsilon model | YJZ | ANSYS | 1 | August 20, 2010 14:57 |
| Constant velocity of the material | Sas | CFX | 15 | July 13, 2010 09:56 |