CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

Problem with porous flow at multi-material interface with large permeability diff.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 3, 2016, 04:33
Default Problem with porous flow at multi-material interface with large permeability diff.
  #1
Senior Member
 
Hisham's Avatar
 
Hisham Elsafti
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 257
Blog Entries: 10
Rep Power: 13
Hisham is on a distinguished road
Dear Foamers,

We have a problem with numerical modelling of the Darcy porous flow at the
interface between layers of two different materials (i.e. different
permeabilities - with large permeability difference)


Motivation
============

This work is part of a study of the interface conditions at marine
granular filter base on seabed (gravel-sand interface under wave
action). To enhance the basic understanding, lab tests are carried
out with oscillatory "pressurized" flow through a closed tube with
gravel-sand layers set vertically (interface is
horizontal). Currently, we are working on reproducing the experiments
numerically.


Introduction
==============

Using the Finite Volume Method through OpenFOAM CFD solvers (no free
surface), we encounter a problem at the interface between two porous
materials.

First, the description of the simulated case configurations; two
layers of different porous materials on top of each other (as shown in
given sketch) for 1D flow in a circular container (modelled as one
quarter of the 3D geometry with symmetry BCs., we had some problems with axisymmetry)

------ U- zeroGradient (Neumann)
| f | & p- as given oscillatory value (Dirichlet)
| i | --> codedFixedValue as a sin wave
| l |
| t |
| e |
| r | k_1 = 3.8x10^(-4) , n_1 = 0.4
------ (the interface)
| s | k_2 = 2.5x10^(-3) , n_2 = 0.4
| e |
| a |
| b |
| e |
| d |
------ U- zeroGradient (Neumann) & p- as given
oscillatory value (Dirichlet) -->
codedFixedValue as a sin wave

A sketch of the case configuration

zeroGradient for velocity to allow flow in and out according to a
given dynamic harmonic pressure that is set to values from the linear
wave theory.

We have been simulating with the $u-p$ approximation of Biot equations
as well as full CFD (PISO algorithm), with the same problems.


The Problems
==============

Velocity
~~~~~~~~~~

There is a sudden change in velocity at the interface


Pressure
~~~~~~~~~~

The mean value for pressure oscillation at the interface is not zero
as it expected and thus there is a net flow, although according to the
given BCs, the flow is oscillatory with zero net flow.


Tested Solutions
==================

Case Configurations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Changing the case configurations (i.e. mesh refinement at the
interface does not seem to help, no effect --> as expected)


Modification of the Solution
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To overcome the pressure gradient discontinuity (pressure gradient
calculated at cell centers instead of faces), we made a correction of
the Darcy permeability at the interface (holding continuity and
momentum balance at the interface) according to Eq. (1) (Szymkiewicz,
2012)



(delta_1 + delta_2) * k_1 * k_2
K_eq = ------------------------------------ Eq. (1)
delta_1 * k_2 + delta_2 * k_1


Assumptions: Mesh orthogonality

K_eq --> equivalent permeability at surface between two adjacent cells
delta_1 --> distance from 1st cell center to face center between cells
1 & 2
delta_2 --> distance from 2nd cell center to face center between
cells 1 & 2
k_1 --> permeability at 1st cell center
k_2 --> permeability at 2nd cell center

The properties multiplied by fluxes in the governing equations are now defined at
cell surfaces instead of center and values are interpolated (permeability is
calculated according to Eq. 1)


Nevertheless, we still have the problem. We would appreciate any suggestions for solving the problem. Thanks in advance.

Reference:

Szymkiewicz A. (2012) "Modelling Water Flow in Unsaturated Porous
Media"


On behalf of my colleagues, best regards,
Hisham
Hisham is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2016, 11:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
cdegroot's Avatar
 
Chris DeGroot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 414
Rep Power: 14
cdegroot is on a distinguished road
I have seen the same issue (in my own code) at clear fluid and porous media interfaces. I wonder if it is the same problem. I have developed some interface conditions to ensure balance of viscous and pressure forces. I have described them in the following article:

A Finite-Volume Model For Fluid Flow and Nonequilibrium Heat Transfer in Conjugate Fluid-Porous Domains Using General Unstructured Grids

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10407790.2011.601180
cdegroot is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
interface, interface gradient, porous media

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 45 September 22, 2015 11:53
error message cuteapathy CFX 14 March 20, 2012 07:45
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 13:02
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair lego CFX 3 November 5, 2002 21:09
fluid flow fundas ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 22:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34.