CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

Energy equation - where is the turbulent kinetic energy?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By usv001

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 24, 2016, 13:04
Default Energy equation - where is the turbulent kinetic energy?
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Singapore
Posts: 102
Rep Power: 10
usv001 is on a distinguished road
Greetings everyone,

In the derivation of the Favre-averaged energy equation, the total energy comprises of the internal energy, mean kinetic energy and turbulent kinetic energy:

\overline{\rho} \widetilde{e_{tot}} = \bar{\rho}\tilde{e} + \frac{1}{2}\bar{\rho}\tilde{u_i}\tilde{u_i} + \overline{\frac{1}{2}\rho u_i^{''}u_i^{''}} (See Chapter 5.3 of Turbulence Modelling for CFD by Wilcox for derivation)

But the compressible flow solvers do not include the turbulent kinetic energy term (k) in the energy equation. Similarly, a few terms on the RHS of the energy equation are also missing.

Does any know why this is the case?

Thanks for all the help!
C. Okubo likes this.
usv001 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 25, 2022, 16:04
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 9
C. Okubo is on a distinguished road

Old topic, but maybe this still helps somebody.

With respect to the doubt, the link below comments a little about the terms being neglected.

If I understood correctly, the reason "is to have the same equation whether one solves for e or h".

I don't know about when this simplifications are OK and when they can cause problems, but I would guess that they may be acceptable for the flow regimes rhoSimpleFoam is intended to solve.

Also, it is not hard to modify the code and test it.

Hope this helps.
C. Okubo is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smagorinsky term in SGS kinetic energy equation Ivan Main CFD Forum 3 January 21, 2013 16:22
A trouble with Turbulent Kinetic energy calculation agoshmc4u Main CFD Forum 0 February 29, 2012 14:39
UDF for changing production of turbulent kinetic energy CFT FLUENT 0 April 20, 2009 03:35
LES: mean velocity and turbulent kinetic energy MET FLUENT 8 December 8, 2006 06:08
Why FVM for high-Re flows? Zhong Lei Main CFD Forum 23 May 14, 1999 14:22

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33.