|
[Sponsors] |
Energy equation - where is the turbulent kinetic energy? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Singapore
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Greetings everyone,
In the derivation of the Favre-averaged energy equation, the total energy comprises of the internal energy, mean kinetic energy and turbulent kinetic energy: ![]() But the compressible flow solvers do not include the turbulent kinetic energy term (k) in the energy equation. Similarly, a few terms on the RHS of the energy equation are also missing. Does any know why this is the case? Thanks for all the help! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Smagorinsky term in SGS kinetic energy equation | Ivan | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 21, 2013 16:22 |
A trouble with Turbulent Kinetic energy calculation | agoshmc4u | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 29, 2012 14:39 |
UDF for changing production of turbulent kinetic energy | CFT | FLUENT | 0 | April 20, 2009 03:35 |
LES: mean velocity and turbulent kinetic energy | MET | FLUENT | 8 | December 8, 2006 06:08 |
Why FVM for high-Re flows? | Zhong Lei | Main CFD Forum | 23 | May 14, 1999 14:22 |