CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

Compilation fails under OF1806+

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By anon_q
  • 1 Post By anon_q
  • 1 Post By olesen
  • 1 Post By olesen

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 6, 2018, 08:35
Unhappy Compilation fails under OF1806+
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 8
anon_q is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I have an OpenFOAM code that compiles and runs properly under OpenFOAM 6.
Now I switched to OpenFOAM V1806 but unfortunately the code doesn't compile. After reading the errors reported by the compiler, I understand that the problem is caused by hashtable, so I decided to isolate the problem and I created the sample code below that produces the same error:

The code:
Code:
#include "fvCFD.H"
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

void fillHashTable(HashTable<List<label>, label>& hashTable, label maxN);
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{

    HashTable<List<label>, label> table1;

    fillHashTable(table1, 5);

    Info << table1 << endl;
    Info<< "End\n" << endl;

    return 0;
}

void fillHashTable(HashTable<List<label>, label>& hashTable, label maxN)
{
    List<label> tmpList;
    for(int i=0; i < maxN; ++i)
    {
        tmpList.clear();
        tmpList = {2*i, i*i, i*i*i};
        hashTable.insert(i , tmpList);
    }
}
The error:
Code:
...
/home/evren/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1806/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/HashTableI.H:35: error: no match for call to ‘(Foam::string::hash) (const int&)’
     return Hash()(key) & (capacity_ - 1);
            ~~~~~~^~~~~
...
As I stated above, the code compiles and works perfectly when I use OpenFOAM 6.
Could you please help me debug this problem, is it a bug?
Update:
After changing the type of key to word it works, Could you please confirm that hashtables in OpenFOAM v1806 work only with string keys?
olesen likes this.

Last edited by anon_q; November 6, 2018 at 12:45.
anon_q is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2018, 16:46
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 8
anon_q is on a distinguished road
Problem solved!
using:
Code:
HashTable<List<label>, label, Hash<label>>
wyldckat likes this.
anon_q is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2018, 20:49
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Mark Olesen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: https://olesenm.github.io/
Posts: 1,689
Rep Power: 40
olesen has a spectacular aura aboutolesen has a spectacular aura about
Your posted solution is correct
Code:
HashTable<List<label>, label, Hash<label>>
Your first attempt using
Code:
HashTable<List<label>, label>
would have compiled and worked in older versions, but for all the wrong reasons. It is understandably annoying that it will not compile in 1806, but I think that is a good thing.



As you've discovered, the HashTable uses a 'word' as its default key, and hashes on that accordingly. If you change the type of the key used in the HashTable, you should be careful that the hashing method also matches.


With

Code:
HashTable<List<label>, label> myHash;

 myHash.insert(10, list1);
myHash.insert(200, list2);
 myHash.insert(3000, list3);
...
The error message actually provides some insight to how poorly this used to behave, and why it was changed for 1806.

Code:
/home/evren/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1806/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/HashTableI.H:35: error: no match for call to ‘(Foam::string::hash) (const int&)’

      return Hash()(key) & (capacity_ - 1);
            ~~~~~~^~~~~
Since the HashTable is using an int for the key, but the hasher requires a string, the compiler tries to find a way to convert the int to a string. This conversion is now explicit for 1806 and won't be considered (ie, the code won't compile). Previously an implicit conversion was permitted. This means that your int value (for example 3000) was converted to a string. Following the constructors, this means that the value of '3000' would be narrowed to a char value (0-255), from which a single character string would have been allocated. This stored data character would have been passed to the Hasher to generate a table value. Apart from the useless overhead of converting to a string etc. We have the obvious problem that all these int values are being narrowed to a char (0-255). This means many, many hash key collisions, which are resolved with chaining. This all would make things really slow.


Since using a 'label' as the key for a HashTable is fairly useful, you would expect that it must be easier than all of this (with much less typing). Indeed it is. The updated code that you should actually be using would be a Map:
Code:
Map<labelList> myHash;
myHash.insert(200, list2);
For 1812, there are additional hasher methods defined for lists of things. This can be useful for various things, one of which is a HashTable of faces.




/mark
anon_q likes this.
olesen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2018, 20:53
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Mark Olesen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: https://olesenm.github.io/
Posts: 1,689
Rep Power: 40
olesen has a spectacular aura aboutolesen has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evren Linda View Post
Hello,
Code:
void fillHashTable(HashTable<List<label>, label>& hashTable, label maxN)
{
    List<label> tmpList;
    for(int i=0; i < maxN; ++i)
    {
        tmpList.clear();
        tmpList = {2*i, i*i, i*i*i};
        hashTable.insert(i , tmpList);
    }
}

Could also use something this

Code:
void fillHashTable(Map<labelList>& hashTable, label maxN)
{
    for(int i=0; i < maxN; ++i)
    {
        hashTable.insert(i , labelList({2*i, i*i, i*i*i}));
    }
}
Unfortunately we don't yet have an emplace insertion method.
anon_q likes this.
olesen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2018, 07:30
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 8
anon_q is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much for the detailed answer
anon_q is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
openfoam, openfoam 1806


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[OpenFOAM.org] OpenFOAM 4.0 compilation fails with latest Intel compiler mstud OpenFOAM Installation 3 October 6, 2016 16:01
Modified interFoam compilation fails voingiappone OpenFOAM Programming & Development 6 October 1, 2013 03:47
OpenFOAM compilation fails on applicationsutilitiesmesh geoffjay OpenFOAM Installation 12 April 29, 2008 15:26
Compilation fails on Linuxx86 agrahn OpenFOAM Bugs 21 August 31, 2007 04:10
Compilation fails on suse linux 101 su_junwei OpenFOAM Bugs 2 July 20, 2007 04:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:18.