|
[Sponsors] |
August 17, 2010, 11:30 |
Uncoupled Eulerian particle transport
|
#1 |
New Member
Peter Hicks
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello
I'm trying to calculate the evolution of particles within a steady pre-calculated air flow using an Eulerian model. For the problem I'm trying to solve (droplet transport through air towards impact with a solid body in aircraft icing), the volume of droplets is very low, so there's no coupling to the air, and no coupling between droplets (so droplet momentum conservation involves a drag term, but no pressure). Firstly, can this case be done with twoPhaseEulerFoam? From my limited understanding of the source code this seems to require both phases to be unsteady. I've been trying to extend scalarTransportFoam to add a droplet momentum conservation equation and I haven't yet got satisfactory results. The guts of my solver are Code:
solve ( fvm::ddt(alpha) + fvm::div(phiDrop, alpha) ); volVectorField Ur = U - UDrop; volScalarField magUr = mag(Ur); fvVectorMatrix UDropEqn ( fvm::ddt(UDrop) + fvm::div(phiDrop, UDrop) - 0.03*magUr*Ur/diamDrop ); solve (UDropEqn); One of the problems I don't seem to be able to get right are the boundary conditions for the droplet velocity (UDrop) and volume fraction (alpha) on the solid body. [1] Gives a boundary condition -alpha*(UDrop dot n) > 0 on the solid surface, but I'm not sure how to replicate this in OpenFOAM. I've been trying inletOutlet and outletInlet conditions, so far without success. Any thoughts/comments/assistance would be greatly appreciated. Peter [1] http://dspace.uta.edu/bitstream/hand...pdf?sequence=1 |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Particle Transport Using the Eulerian Model | Converge please! | FLUENT | 2 | February 24, 2010 05:14 |
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] | dm2747 | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2009 01:29 |
particle transport model | Fabiana | CFX | 0 | January 10, 2006 15:00 |
convergence in particle transport model | Jose Tinoco | CFX | 0 | March 3, 2003 03:10 |