CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Unexpected behaviour of timeVaryingMappedFixedValue

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 13, 2012, 21:03
Default Unexpected behaviour of timeVaryingMappedFixedValue
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7
Kopy is on a distinguished road
Hi Guys,

this is my first post but not my first experience with this forum. I worked on CFD since about 2 years and this forum was always a great source of usefull information. So thanks for all your great work here. Now I got an unexpected problem and I would be glad to hear some experiences and opinions.

I want to investigate the development of turbulence in time and space by calculating a direct numerical simulation (DNS). The geometrical setup is a simple channel. To avoid development of a boundary layer I use symmetry conditions on the "walls".

To generate the inlet conditions I previously ran a simulation with a pseudospectral code (hit3d) and extracted slices. I fed these slices into my channel domain by using the "timeVaryingMappedFixedValue" boundary condition for U. So far everything seems to be perfect. While postprocessing I got some unexpected behaviour of the turbulence on the inlet.

A closer look reveled a strange behaviour of the inlet conditions:

Timestep t1:

HIT Simulation ................... OpenFOAM

Timestep t2:

HIT Simulation ................... OpenFOAM

The four pictures show the slice which is defined in the constants/boundaryData/inlet directory (called HIT Simulation) and the slice extracted from the inlet in the result file of openFOAM (called openFOAM) for two different time steps.

In timestep t1 you can see, that the pictures (respectively the velocity fields) are very simmilar. If you have a closer look you would see that the magnitude of the velocity is different: The velosity in the openFOAM solution is less than in the HIT slice.

Timestep t2 shows a complete reverse behaviour: It is still the same field, but the velocities in openFOAM are incrased compared to the HIT slice.

This is a very unexpectable behaviour (for me!). The grid resolution in the plane is in both cases 128≤ so I would exclude interpolation errors.

Did someone experienced problems like this? Do you have any idea what is going on while interpolating? Is there any other interpolation?

I would be glad to share more information if you need more.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Kopy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2012, 18:15
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7
Kopy is on a distinguished road
Hey Guys,

I would like to disable interpolation of the inlet conditions just to check if this is the reason for the damping of my velocity field.

Is it possible to disable the interpolation without touching the source code?
Kopy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2012, 15:11
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7
Kopy is on a distinguished road
Solved my problem.
My physical setup caused a pressure gradient. The input data works just fine.
Kopy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 15, 2013, 12:27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: France
Posts: 152
Rep Power: 7
Djub is on a distinguished road
Hi Kopy,

could you explain me be a bit more about "My physical setup caused a pressure gradient. The input data works just fine. " ? What about your p-inlet? What BC did you use for outlet?
Djub is offline   Reply With Quote


dns, icofoam, inlet boundary condition, varyingmappedfixedvalue

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
unexpected flow speeds within porous zones MasterCooler OpenFOAM 11 May 2, 2012 07:48
Odd residual behaviour for Two Layer K Epsilon dvcauwe Main CFD Forum 1 March 7, 2012 06:47
Unstable behaviour after long period of stablility plunge11 FLUENT 1 April 6, 2011 09:15
Installation of OpenFOAM15dev antonio_ing OpenFOAM Installation 34 December 18, 2009 11:06
Modelling Industrial cyclone behaviour GŁnther Hasse Main CFD Forum 3 October 12, 1999 19:34

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:41.