|
[Sponsors] |
June 13, 2013, 22:48 |
omega wall function
|
#1 |
Member
RacMat
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
I am a little confused about the omega wall boundary condition. I am running a turbulent flow over flat plate ( simpleFoam,komegaSST, 10m/s, 1%Tu intensity) and comparing the value of cf with a theoretical correlation. When i use the Menter's wall boundary condition the cf is underpredicted ( about 70% error i think) but when i use the omegawall functions value at the wall ( i run the case with the wall function for a few iterations and see what value it uses( which is a constant along the wall) and then use that particular value as 'fixedValue'), i get very good results ( <4% error) To understand why this was happening, I looked at the omega wall function code and saw the following line: scalar omegaVis = 6.0*nuw[faceI]/(beta1_*sqr(y[faceI])); instead of the 60 ( as in menter's paper) there is a 6.0 in the wall function code. Why is this so? Which one is correct? Thanks for your help!! |
|
Tags |
komegasst, menter, omega wall function |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] mesh airfoil NACA0012 | anand_30 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 13 | March 7, 2022 17:22 |
simpleFoam for complicated geometry, non-orthogonal mesh, omega wall function | achinta | OpenFOAM | 2 | October 25, 2013 00:58 |
Compile problem | ivanyao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 12, 2012 09:31 |
channelFoam for a 3D pipe | AlmostSurelyRob | OpenFOAM | 3 | June 24, 2011 13:06 |
Need some wall function approaches! | yka8150 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 21, 2009 23:08 |