|
[Sponsors] |
October 31, 2014, 05:44 |
Heat transfer convergence problem
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 397
Rep Power: 18 |
I'm trying to simulate a problem which involves heat transfer from a very hot gas (plasma) in a wall. Concerning this problem, my solver is basically a merged version of sonicFoam and chtMultiRegionFoam (only the heat transfer part). The plasma has a large radiative flux and the wall isn't a very good heat conductor, so melting and evaporation occurs in reality.
I'm using the compressible::turbulentTemperatureRadCoupledMixed boundary condition that considers heat conduction and radiative heat fluxes through the boundary. This boundary condition always results in a temperature at the patch of 0 K... I've tried various things, increasing iterations and using relaxation factors but without success. The temperature will start with a negative (!) value at the patch in the iteration procedure and converge against 0 K in a few steps. The alpha value in the code of the BC will start oscillating with an increasing amplitude. Using the compressible::turbulentTemperatureCoupledBaffleMix ed BC, the solution will converge, but since the radiation isn't considered this BC is not applicable to my problem. I would expect the total heat fluxes to be the same on both sides of the patch when converged to satisfy energy conservation. Any ideas for this? You can also take a look at my related topic here: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...pling-bcs.html |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
inverse heat transfer problem | siva0182 | FLUENT | 6 | February 22, 2019 06:00 |
Heat Transfer Problem in FLUENT | eng_yasser_2020 | FLUENT | 3 | February 19, 2019 02:13 |
Inverse and Transient Heat Transfer Problem on commercial software: is it possible? | rogbrito | CFX | 1 | January 29, 2012 17:48 |
regarding B.C. of Heat transfer problem | Manoj Padmakarrao Raut | Siemens | 0 | March 17, 2005 00:01 |
Heat transfer problem | Brian | CFX | 0 | September 13, 2004 01:19 |