CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Can OpenFoam solve this problem?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 9, 2015, 14:18
Default Can OpenFoam solve this problem?
  #1
New Member
 
Miguel Salazar
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7
salazardetroya is on a distinguished road
Hello everybody

I am trying to solve the next problem that I have been struggling with trying to implement it by myself. I was wondering if I could use OpenFoam instead and how long it could take me in order to figure out how to solve it (I'm pretty good with C++ and my knowledge on turbulence models is decent at this point) I am asking this question because I have a time constraint (1 month) and I don't know if I will have time to switch and solve the problem with OpenFoam or try to debug my implementation. So basically I'm asking for two simple questions: Can OpenFoam solve this problem? how long would it take me given my current knowledge on turbulence models and C++?

The problem is this described in this paper (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...20126/abstract) I will describe it here as well, but you can find the equations there.

I'm solving a turbidity current vertical profile. From the 2D RANS equations, I neglect the convective terms because I assume the flow has developed and does not change in the longitudinal direction. With that assumption and the conservation equation, I am left with just the streamwise velocity component's equation. This mean flow equation has a source term which is the sediment concentration. The concentration follows a conservation equation. As a turbulence model, I'm using k-epsilon.

One thing different from the paper mentioned above is that in my case there is no roof, the turbidity current is in the lower part of a larger domain that it is mostly at rest.

The tricky part of the implementation is the wall function. Special care needs to be taken because of the buoyant forces produced by the concentration. Can OpenFoam take this into account? The common log-law is not accurate since it ignores buoyant forces.

So, can OpenFoam solve this? If so, how long will it take me?

Please let me know if you might need more details. Thanks in advance.

Edit: High Reynolds number is assumed.

Miguel

Last edited by salazardetroya; July 9, 2015 at 14:40. Reason: Forgot details
salazardetroya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 29, 2015, 22:34
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Xavier Pivan
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
Navip is on a distinguished road
Hi Miguel, did you solve your problem ?

If there's settling within your turbidity current you can use settlingFoam. I use it and reproduce well experiment found in literature except that the advective term in the AlphaEqn.H are missing. It could explain the early the stop of my turbidity current.

I try to implement the advectiveFvPatchField.H within this solver and see how it does affect the motion.

Xavier
Navip is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
buoyant flow, k-epsilon model, wall function

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem when installing Openfoam 2.0.x with mac giovaniharyadi OpenFOAM Installation 0 March 24, 2012 18:45
Problem installing OpenFOAM 1.5 installation on RHEL 4. vwsj84 OpenFOAM Installation 4 April 23, 2009 04:48
Adventure of fisrst openfoam installation on Ubuntu 710 jussi OpenFOAM Installation 0 April 24, 2008 14:25
Problem in installation of OpenFOAM sachin OpenFOAM Installation 7 January 22, 2008 01:40
Can FLUENT solve this type of problem? Whitaker FLUENT 3 October 23, 2000 03:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32.