CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

anyone know the difference between three heat transfer boundary condition

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 6, 2017, 08:38
Default anyone know the difference between three heat transfer boundary condition
  #1
Member
 
ff
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 16
fxzf is on a distinguished road
Hello,

Does anyone know what is major difference between the following three heat transfer boundary conditions?

externalWallHeatFluxTemperature
compressible::turbulentTemperatureRadCoupledMixed
compressible::turbulentTemperatureCoupledBaffleMix ed

Is it possible to use externalWallHeatFluxTemperature in multi-region conjugate heat transfer at border between solid and fluid?

Thanks very much.
fxzf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2017, 15:49
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 353
Rep Power: 20
Bloerb will become famous soon enough
Code:
compressible::turbulentTemperatureRadCoupledMixed
compressible::turbulentTemperatureCoupledBaffleMixed
These two are identical with the exception that the first one adds radiation. These are coupling conditions for multi region cases. Hence the polyMesh/boundary file must read "mappedWall" for all boundaries this is used on. They are mixed boundaries on both sides. Other possibilities to couple multi region cases are possible though. In foam-extend there is an block coupled approach for example.

Code:
externalWallHeatFluxTemperature
This one has can operate in several modes. It can set a heat flux, flux/mē or an heat transfer coefficient and ambient temperature. Using this on a coupled patch is not wise as it does not couple the regions. You should instead use the above. If you want to use this at the border between a fluid without actually simulating the surrounding region it is the choice you should use.

There are also fvOption conditions to couple regions via their volume and not their boundary. For example useful if you want to simulate a heat exchanger without meshing thousands of interlocking pipes. You could instead couple them via a porosity and a function object.
Bloerb is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel kevinmccartin CFX 12 October 13, 2022 21:43
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 07:38
Multiphase flow - incorrect velocity on inlet Mike_Tom CFX 6 September 29, 2016 01:27
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 06:20
natural convection mehrdadeng CFX 10 February 25, 2011 05:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06.