 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
December 17, 2015, 15:21
|
Initialization using PotentialFoam
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Sana Ullah
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Daejeon,South Korea
Posts: 28
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 12  |
Hi guys!
Usually it is recommended to initialize U and P using PotentialFoam, Is this recommended for flows involving multiple inlets inside domain? I observed that while I initialized this kind of problem with PotentialFoam, the forces just shoot with the very first iteration and then comedown. Can this effect the solution accuracy at the end, because of large initial forces. Not using PotentialFoam does give regular startup. Any comments to clarify! Thanks Mehar
__________________
Mehar, Phd Scholar KAIST, Korea |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| openfoam, potentialfoam |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FMG initialization query | Mohsin | FLUENT | 6 | November 2, 2016 02:02 |
| Initialization with potentialFoam | Sune | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | March 2, 2016 12:18 |
| potentialFoam doesnt start?! | Sway | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 2, 2015 07:48 |
| Units problem and boundary conditions with potentialFoam | Calu | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 14, 2014 13:31 |
| potentialFoam porousBafflePressure turbulence | GRAUPS | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 3 | January 23, 2014 14:11 |
Linear Mode
