|
[Sponsors] |
simpleFoam for kEpsilon 2D airfoil (blowing up..). |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 7, 2017, 02:00 |
simpleFoam for kEpsilon 2D airfoil (blowing up..).
|
#1 |
Member
bye bye my blue
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8 |
20, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 5.05504e+15, global = 0.0217413, cumulative = 0.0228677 smoothSolver: Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 5.02539e-31, Final residual = 5.02539e-31, No Iterations 0 smoothSolver: Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.511106, Final residual = 0.0181972, No Iterations 2 ExecutionTime = 22.52 s ClockTime = 23 s Time = 16 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.548209, Final residual = 0.0378744, No Iterations 2 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.657187, Final residual = 0.0472878, No Iterations 2 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 9.27084e-14, Final residual = 9.27084e-14, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 9.27084e-14, Final residual = 9.27084e-14, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 9.27084e-14, Final residual = 9.27084e-14, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 9.27084e-14, Final residual = 9.27084e-14, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 9.27084e-14, Final residual = 9.27084e-14, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 9.27084e-14, Final residual = 9.27084e-14, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.48378e+20, global = 7133.3, cumulative = 7133.32 smoothSolver: Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 5.30678e-24, Final residual = 5.30678e-24, No Iterations 0 smoothSolver: Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.0142531, Final residual = 0.000883614, No Iterations 2 bounding k, min: -4.46816e+29 max: 5.01191e+45 average: 4.17184e+41 ExecutionTime = 22.58 s ClockTime = 23 s Time = 17 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.602631, Final residual = 0.046969, No Iterations 2 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.686435, Final residual = 0.047856, No Iterations 2 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1.5226e-12, Final residual = 1.5226e-12, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1.5226e-12, Final residual = 1.5226e-12, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1.5226e-12, Final residual = 1.5226e-12, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1.5226e-12, Final residual = 1.5226e-12, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1.5226e-12, Final residual = 1.5226e-12, No Iterations 0 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1.5226e-12, Final residual = 1.5226e-12, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.75735e+20, global = 30482.7, cumulative = 37616 smoothSolver: Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 2.15223e-27, Final residual = 2.15223e-27, No Iterations 0 smoothSolver: Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.450582, Final residual = 0.0255508, No Iterations 2 ExecutionTime = 22.66 s ClockTime = 23 s Time = 18 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.42828, Final residual = 0.022633, No Iterations 3 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.431794, Final residual = 0.0276397, No Iterations 3 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.39554e-05, Final residual = 1.09496e+38, No Iterations 2000 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00023719, Final residual = 1.15371e+38, No Iterations 2000 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.35836e-06, Final residual = 2.12539e-08, No Iterations 196 #0 Foam::error:rintStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??:? #1 Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) at ??:? #2 ? in "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6" #3 double Foam::sumProd<double>(Foam::UList<double> const&, Foam::UList<double> const&) at ??:? #4 Foam::PCG::solve(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const at ??:? #5 Foam::GAMGSolver::solveCoarsestLevel(Foam::Field<d ouble>&, Foam::Field<double> const&) const at ??:? #6 Foam::GAMGSolver::Vcycle(Foam::PtrList<Foam::lduMa trix::smoother> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, unsigned char) const at ??:? #7 Foam::GAMGSolver::solve(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const at ??:? #8 Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solveSegregated(Foam::dict ionary const&) at ??:? #9 Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve(Foam::dictionary const&) at ??:? #10 Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve() at ??:? #11 ? at ??:? #12 __libc_start_main in "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6" #13 ? at ??:? 부동 소수점 예외 (core dumped) when I did simpleFoam kEpsilon, the error occurred... I don't know how to solve it -.- Here are my 0 and system folder and give me advices.. thanks |
|
February 7, 2017, 09:27 |
|
#2 |
Member
jey
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Greece
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 9 |
Hey blue
Can you upload the whole .log file of your simulation please? And possibly upload the whole case including the /constant folder (if it is not too big) on a link (i.e. dropbox) Kind regards |
|
February 7, 2017, 19:43 |
|
#3 |
Member
bye bye my blue
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8 |
Dear jeytsav. I fixed this problem to change relaxation factor.
But I have questions. when i plotted Cp ( xFoil vs RAS solutions), I can saw big difference near x=0.2.. Is it mesh problem?? or schemes? p.s) i don't have dropbox.. so i cannot upload /constant |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with airfoil shape optimization | robyTKD | SU2 Shape Design | 7 | March 7, 2022 16:18 |
SU2 AOA optimization | 454514566@qq.com | SU2 | 9 | March 7, 2022 16:17 |
Ffd_control_point_2d | feiyi | SU2 | 4 | September 30, 2019 12:42 |
High drag for airfoil compared to XFOIL and wind tunnel data | Ry10 | SU2 | 15 | October 30, 2016 17:27 |
2D FFD Optimization | RLangtry | SU2 | 2 | August 5, 2014 09:48 |