|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Guilherme
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Hi foamers,
I have a little doubt ... when I read: "For our discussion of mapFields we need to define a few terms. First, we say that the data is mapped from the source to the target. The fields are deemed consistent if the geometry and boundary types, or conditions, of both source and target fields are identical. The field data that mapFields maps are those fields within the time directory specified by startFrom/startTime in the controlDict of the target case. The data is read from the equivalent time directory of the source case and mapped onto the equivalent time directory of the target case.", on: https://cfd.direct/openfoam/user-guide/mapfields/ ... I understand that I need to first run RANS normally (what I'm already doing) and later, in LES, I add the mapFields function, am I correct? *The geometries and boundary conditions will be the same.* This is important to me because, according to the recommendations of: (https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...ug/node560.htm) - STEP 1. Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
As far as I understand , you don't need mapFields at all. You may run your simulation with a solver and continue with another one. The only thing you have to keep in mind are the additional model parameters of both solvers.
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Guilherme
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Thanks for your answer.
I just wanted to reinforce it to see if I understood correctly ... Did you say that first I need to run RANS, after getting the results ... in the same folder, modify the parameters for LES, and solve? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30 ![]() |
Only if you are keeping the same mesh. Otherwise you need to map, just as you thought.
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit *Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Guilherme
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Same mesh and initial conditions. REALLY thanks for the answers.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
large eddy simulation, les model, mapfields, mapfieldsdict |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Model Switch, RANS to LES? | jennap223 | STAR-CCM+ | 0 | July 7, 2015 12:30 |
Transition RANS to LES during simulation | LorenzN | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | November 17, 2011 11:47 |
Laminar Flamlet RANS to LES | LB | FLUENT | 0 | September 5, 2007 06:35 |
Mapping RANS data onto an LES | christian | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 13, 2007 06:31 |
RANS results for LES | Li Yang | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2002 06:34 |