CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

K (turbulent kinetic energy) ground(wall) BC

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 18, 2017, 06:41
Question K (turbulent kinetic energy) ground(wall) BC
  #1
rmz
New Member
 
rmz
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Paris
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6
rmz is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am working on a simulation of wind on buildings.
I am using a RASModel kEspilon with the simpleFoam solver.
I am applying ABL (atmospheric boundary layer) conditions.

for the "ground" patch of my domain the boundary condition of K is KqRWallFunction, but I am not sure which value should I use. in most of the tutorials they apply the same value as the internal field but in the turbineSiting tutorial they applied uniform 0.

so for the K on the ground patch should I apply
KqRWallFunction - value: uniform 0
or
KqRWallFunction - value: same as internalField

thank you for your help.
rmz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 19, 2017, 05:31
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Tom Fahner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Breda, Netherlands
Posts: 589
Rep Power: 28
tomf will become famous soon enoughtomf will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to tomf Send a message via Skype™ to tomf
Hi,

For the value for a derived boundary condition (such as wall functions) usually the value entry is only a placeholder. It may get used in the first iteration if some value is needed, but usually a value will be set as soon as the boundary condition is updated. This means most of the time as long as the value is physical it does not matter too much what this value is. There may be some rare cases where there is an influence, but I would not know one by heart.

In your case I would use the internalField value, but I doubt you will find much difference if you use 0.

Regards,
Tom
tomf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2017, 04:28
Default
  #3
rmz
New Member
 
rmz
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Paris
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6
rmz is on a distinguished road
Hi,

thank you Tom for your help. now I understand how it works.
for information, I did 2 simulations with different initial K conditions (as stated in post #1) and obtained the same results.

Best Regards
rmz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
abl flow, boundary condition, building aerodynamics, turbulent kinetic energy, wall boundary condition

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to obtain turbulent kinetic energy data from LES model of Ansys CFX? rsin CFX 19 December 29, 2018 05:43
Turbulent Kinetic Energy for a one-equation model wgvanveen Main CFD Forum 0 March 25, 2015 07:26
LES and total turbulent kinetic energy Boerge FLUENT 1 September 8, 2012 12:41
what's the meaning of turbulent kinetic energy? help!!! syd STAR-CCM+ 1 August 31, 2010 10:22
sgs turbulent kinetic energy blons Main CFD Forum 0 February 25, 2010 13:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:37.