|
[Sponsors] |
Cavity 3D : 4.1 versus 3.0.1 performance issue |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 10, 2017, 11:24 |
Cavity 3D : 4.1 versus 3.0.1 performance issue
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi guys,
I知 using the cavity-3D case with a 3M cells mesh. I知 currently having a performance issue while using 4.1 version. Here is the output I got with 4.1. Starting time loop Time = 0.0001 Courant Number mean: 0 max: 0 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 1.68989e-06, No Iterations 3 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 smoothSolver: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0477591, No Iterations 153 time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.75823e-08, global = 1.4455e-23, cumulative = 1.4455e-23 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0857006, Final residual = 9.88484e-07, No Iterations 528 time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.13433e-12, global = 6.91952e-24, cumulative = 2.13745e-23 ExecutionTime = 4.56 s ClockTime = 4 s While I got the following with 3.0.1: Time = 0.0001 Courant Number mean: 0 max: 0 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 1.68989e-06, No Iterations 3 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 smoothSolver: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0477591, No Iterations 153 time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.75823e-08, global = -1.14771e-23, cumulative = -1.14771e-23 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0857006, Final residual = 0.00406192, No Iterations 149 time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.79613e-09, global = 9.74005e-24, cumulative = -1.73708e-24 ExecutionTime = 2.59 s ClockTime = 6 s Does anyone know why It would take twice the number of iteration to make the same step in 4.1 than in 3.0.1 ? Thanks in advance, Ludo |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Methods to optimize the performance of simpleFoam solver for lid driven cavity case | Sumeet Patil | OpenFOAM | 0 | October 15, 2016 05:06 |
[Other] issue 1_running several mesh configurations for a cavity model (tutorial) | Luis Batista | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 24, 2013 18:24 |
[OpenFOAM] ParaFOAM issue with cavity case | mschoenberg | ParaView | 3 | November 21, 2008 03:57 |