CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Boundary Conditions for Supersonic Flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 14, 2017, 16:39
Default Boundary Conditions for Supersonic Flow
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 9
wididid is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have been struggling with creating a correct solution for the simulation of a retrorocket in supersonic flow. Before I add the retrorocket boundary condition, I am trying to run it with a mach 2 flow to see a zero thrust case that I can use for an initial guess later.

My initial attempt to do this followed the example found here and uses similar boundary conditions and rhoCentralFoam albeit with different values for velocity, pressure, and temperature. I suspect my boundary conditions are incorrect since the back patch is behaving very oddly with flow reversing and the flow fluctuating. Is there a more appropriate boundary condition for the top and back patches besides zero gradient? Or perhaps some other insight that could help me simulate this more correctly?

I've attached the result of my simulation.

Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: png Domain.png (39.5 KB, 147 views)
File Type: png flow.png (78.6 KB, 188 views)
wididid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 15, 2017, 02:02
Default
  #2
Member
 
Taiwan,new north city
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 8
Rajaero is on a distinguished road
hello, there
The reversed flow occurs because of the inlet and outlet pressure setting. many people saying that the reversed flow will not affect the results much but it will affect the convergence rate.
i think i read somewhere, we need to set the outlet pressure initially then once the solution converged then you can choose the appropriate pressure for the inlet and outlet.
someone suggest about this. you can check it in this forum.
Rajaero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 15, 2017, 12:50
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 9
wididid is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the reply,

When you say to set the outlet pressure initially, what value should I be using? Should I set the outlet pressure to be a value based on the freestream or the pressure as though the flow went through a shock?

My intent was to leave the top and outlet unspecified so that that the solution would acquire these values for me. Would it be better to specify the outlet pressure or use a waveTransmissive boundary condition?

I've attached my u,T,and p files in case they are useful.

Thanks
Attached Files
File Type: zip files.zip (1.5 KB, 49 views)
wididid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 15, 2017, 20:20
Default
  #4
Member
 
Taiwan,new north city
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 8
Rajaero is on a distinguished road
Hi..there,
check the following, its available in fluent manual.
Pressure outlet boundary conditions require the specification of a static (gauge) pressure at the outlet boundary. The value of the specified static pressure is used only while the flow is subsonic. Should the flow become locally supersonic, the specified pressure will no longer be used; pressure will be extrapolated from the flow in the interior. All other flow quantities are extrapolated from the interior.
A set of "backflow'' conditions is also specified should the flow reverse direction at the pressure outlet boundary during the solution process. Convergence difficulties will be minimized if you specify realistic values for the backflow quantities.
Several options in FLUENT exist, where a radial equilibrium outlet boundary condition can be used (see Section 7.8.1 for details), and a target mass flow rate for pressure outlets (see Section 7.8.4 for details) can be specified.
For an overview of flow boundaries, see Section 7.2.
Rajaero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2017, 20:36
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 9
wididid is on a distinguished road
I'm not sure how this applies to my particular case. In my case I'm trying to leave the outlet unspecified by using a zeroGradient condition so that I do not need to specify outlet flow properties such as pressure. Is my assumption that I can use a zeroGradient here correct? Considering how close the back patch is to the body I suspect it may not be.
wididid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2017, 01:17
Default
  #6
Member
 
Taiwan,new north city
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 8
Rajaero is on a distinguished road
yes i think you can
Rajaero is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3D Windturbine simulation in SU2 k.vimalakanthan SU2 15 October 12, 2023 05:53
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 07:30
Velocity vector in impeller passage ngoc_tran_bao CFX 24 May 3, 2016 21:16
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids ashtonJ CFX 6 August 11, 2014 14:32
Please help with flow around car modelling! Tudor Miron CFX 17 March 19, 2004 19:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:35.