
[Sponsors] 
Temperature convergence problem with nonsmooth thermal conductivity 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 
November 6, 2017, 18:10 
Temperature convergence problem with nonsmooth thermal conductivity

#1 
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 
Hi all,
I am trying to run a problem where thermal conductivity is a nonsmooth function of temperature, where the nonsmoothness results from dealing with a phase change material. I am having trouble getting the temperature equation of the solver to converge under certain conditions and would be curious if anyone has any thoughts as to what may be going wrong. In my model, the conductivity is a linear function of temperature. For regions yet to be melted, the conductivity is k1(T) = a*T + b. Once a region has been melted, the conductivity becomes k2 = kfactor*k1(T), even if it resolidifies. kfactor is between 10 and 100 for problems I want to run. This creates regions in the mesh where cells located next to each other can have similar temperatures but have a jump in conductivity between 10x and 100x. When I set kfactor to 1, my case runs smoothly with no convergence issues. If I modify my code to ignore the melted/unmelted distinction and let conductivity k = k2(T), I get the same (good) behavior as when I use kfactor = 1. This leads me to believe that I don’t have a bug in the implementation of the conductivity function and that the nonsmooth jump in conductivity between cells may be the culprit. Below I include my solver setting files, as well as the last few lines of the OpenFoam equation residual output which includes the initial temperature equation blowup and subsequent simulation crash. I’d be grateful if anyone has any ideas on how to resolve the issue of the temperature equation blowing up for kfactor > 10. I’m hopeful that tweaking some solver settings could iron out the convergence issues – I’ve made some blind attempts so far, but no luck. Any thoughts are appreciated! Thank you! fvSchemes: Code:
/** C++ **\  =========    \\ / F ield  OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox   \\ / O peration  Version: 3.0.0   \\ / A nd  Web: www.OpenFOAM.org   \\/ M anipulation   \**/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object fvSchemes; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default Euler; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { default Gauss upwind; div(phi,U) Gauss upwind; div((phi*interpolate(cp)),T) Gauss upwind; } laplacianSchemes { default none; //Gauss linear corrected; laplacian((lambdarho),T) Gauss linear uncorrected; //corrected laplacian(nu,U) Gauss linear uncorrected; // corrected laplacian((1A(U)),p_rgh) Gauss linear uncorrected; // corrected } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default uncorrected; //corrected; } fluxRequired { default no; p_rgh; } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/** C++ **\  =========    \\ / F ield  OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox   \\ / O peration  Version: 3.0.0   \\ / A nd  Web: www.OpenFOAM.org   \\/ M anipulation   \**/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object fvSolution; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // solvers { p_rgh { solver GAMG; smoother GaussSeidel; tolerance 1e8; relTol 0.01; } p_rghFinal { $p_rgh; relTol 0; } T { solver PBiCG; preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e7; relTol 0.1; } TFinal { solver PBiCG; preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e9; relTol 0; } U { solver PBiCG; preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e6; relTol 0.1; } UFinal { $U; relTol 0; } } PIMPLE { momentumPredictor yes; //yes; nOuterCorrectors 1; //1; nCorrectors 1; nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 0; pRefCell 0; pRefValue 0; } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
... ... ... Courant Number mean: 0.0006917597 max: 0.27723292 deltaT = 9.9667774e07 PIMPLE: iteration 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.0047223043, Final residual = 2.1859185e07, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.0048172404, Final residual = 2.3390652e07, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.0041326105, Final residual = 1.7710191e09, No Iterations 3 DILUPBiCG: Solving for T, Initial residual = 0.00060871525, Final residual = 9.7934538e10, No Iterations 4 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 0.067143822, Final residual = 8.550094e09, No Iterations 13 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.4964727e13, global = 9.497921e14, cumulative = 4.9549033e11 ExecutionTime = 284.84 s ClockTime = 287 s Time = 0.000703654485 Interpolating laser coordinate Interpolating laser coordinate Vx = 100 Vy = 0 Vmag = 100 Courant Number mean: 0.00069140376 max: 0.27616178 deltaT = 9.9667774e07 PIMPLE: iteration 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.0043974518, Final residual = 4.3794962e07, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.0044430772, Final residual = 3.5340057e07, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.0047550922, Final residual = 1.9589747e09, No Iterations 3 DILUPBiCG: Solving for T, Initial residual = 0.00061698156, Final residual = 93345.397, No Iterations 1001 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 0.99749556, Final residual = 6.74928e09, No Iterations 21 time step continuity errors : sum local = 5.4155474e11, global = 6.3819725e14, cumulative = 4.9612853e11 ExecutionTime = 291.17 s ClockTime = 293 s Time = 0.0007046511628 Interpolating laser coordinate Interpolating laser coordinate Vx = 100 Vy = 0 Vmag = 100 Courant Number mean: 0.00073293333 max: 2.4614658 deltaT = 4.0444894e07 PIMPLE: iteration 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.99996533, Final residual = 4.1997867e08, No Iterations 3 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.99996593, Final residual = 7.471817e07, No Iterations 3 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.84149551, Final residual = 4.3093462e09, No Iterations 3 DILUPBiCG: Solving for T, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 5.326721e10, No Iterations 11 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 8.2242381e09, No Iterations 41 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3187537.2, global = 3187537.1, cumulative = 3187537.1 ExecutionTime = 291.84 s ClockTime = 294 s Time = 0.0007050556117 Interpolating laser coordinate Interpolating laser coordinate Vx = 100 Vy = 0 Vmag = 100 Courant Number mean: 5.0625884e+08 max: 2.3247589e+12 deltaT = 1.7397457e19 PIMPLE: iteration 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.002170343, Final residual = 1.3269969e08, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.004592665, Final residual = 2.2649814e07, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.011799993, Final residual = 4.0934735e10, No Iterations 3 DILUPBiCG: Solving for T, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 4.219571e10, No Iterations 4 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 6.0997958e09, No Iterations 28 time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.5050765e+21, global = 2.5050765e+21, cumulative = 2.5050765e+21 ExecutionTime = 292.35 s ClockTime = 294 s Time = 0.0007050556117 Interpolating laser coordinate Interpolating laser coordinate Vx = 79.769059 Vy = 0 Vmag = 79.769059 Courant Number mean: 4.0417955e+23 max: 1.9357799e+27 deltaT = 8.9873118e47 PIMPLE: iteration 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.00087760067, Final residual = 5.1400685e08, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.0011133698, Final residual = 9.93714e09, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.013898725, Final residual = 2.1458128e08, No Iterations 3 [5] #0 [9] [4] #0 Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[8] #0 Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)#0 Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) An MPI process has executed an operation involving a call to the "fork()" system call to create a child process. Open MPI is currently operating in a condition that could result in memory corruption or other system errors; your MPI job may hang, crash, or produce silent data corruption. The use of fork() (or system() or other calls that create child processes) is strongly discouraged. ... ... ... 

November 7, 2017, 14:08 

#2 
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 12 
Hi
There is a paper from Voller saying that you should use harmonic interpolation for non constant thermal conductivity. (TREATMENT OF DISCONTINUOUS THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY IN CONTROLVOLUME SOLUTIONS OF PHASECHANGE PROBLEMS V. R. Voller & C. R. Swaminathan) But I don't think that this is your main problem. With a non constant thermal conductivity you are introducing a non linearity into your problem and you have to use iterations to resolve it. I don't know how you are resolving the phase change but you can update the thermal conductivity in that iteration loop. Best Moritz 

November 8, 2017, 18:26 

#3 
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 
Hi Moritz,
That is a great tip and using a harmonic interpolation scheme for the laplacian does seem to solve my convergence issues. Thank you! Also just a note that my solver is already set up to iterate to handle the nonlinearities in the temperature equation, with temperature and conductivity updates in the appropriate places. Your answer also led me to to a better understanding of how the laplacian term and nonconstant conductivity is handled in OpenFoam/FVM versus how I would actually like it to behave. This may be the wrong subforum to discuss this, but I'll elaborate here: Let's assume my model consists of phases 1 and 2. As previously described, each phase has conductivity as a linear function of temperature but k2(T) = 100*k1(T). For my specific problem, heat flows well (higher conductivity) between a 12 and 22 interface but not between a 11 interface. If you do harmonic interpolation you can see that it actually gives an interpolated value of a conductivity much closer to the low k1 value than the k2 value at a 12 interface, which is not the result I would like for my model. So I would actually like to define conductivity between a 11 interface as k1(T) and between a 12 and 22 interface as k2(T), with T taking the interpolated temperature value between cells. How to do this in OpenFoam is another question altogether, but I would like to ask, is there anything about that approach that is numerically flawed and would lead nonconvergence of the solver? 

November 13, 2017, 04:56 

#4 
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 12 
Hi
I think it is possible to define the surfaceScalarField for the laplacian directly. So you could interpolate your phase fraction (let us assume its called alpha) on the cell faces. If alpha is zero you prescribe thermal conductivity 1 to that face. If alpha is greater than zero thermal conductivity 2. I not 100% sure if you can do it directly on the surfaceScalarField with pos/neg function but I am sure that you can do it with a forAll loop. Best Moritz 

November 14, 2017, 13:25 

#5 
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 
Hi Moritz,
Thanks again for your thoughts. The programmer's manual confirms that you can supply a surfaceScalarField as the coefficient argument to fvm::laplacian, so your method for prescribing thermal conductivity should work for me. I will try it out and see it how it behaves. Also, I just wanted to note that I was able to get my model to work with linear interpolation of the diffusion coefficient when I reduced the time step. So to summarize for any other interested readers, I was able to avoid nonconvergence of my solver by 1) Using harmonic interpolation of the diffusion coefficient (specified in fvSchemes). This solved my convergence issue, although I realized the resulting solution didn't behave how I wanted it to for my specific model. 2) Retaining linear interpolation of the coefficient but reducing the timestep for my transient simulation. A larger reduction was required when I used boundary conditions which induced sharper thermal gradients. Thanks very much for your replies, Moritz, as I learned a lot and also solved my issue. 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
[openSmoke] libOpenSMOKE  Tobi  OpenFOAM Community Contributions  562  January 25, 2023 09:21 
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel  kevinmccartin  CFX  12  October 13, 2022 21:43 
Problem in setting Boundary Condition  Madhatter92  CFX  12  January 12, 2016 04:39 
Indoor Air Temperature distribution  convergence problem  Shogan  FLUENT  4  May 8, 2014 02:07 
The unit of thermal conductivity when adding temperature equation to icoFoam?  mxylondon  OpenFOAM  2  February 26, 2013 05:26 