|
[Sponsors] |
November 29, 2017, 13:18 |
What's wrong with my case?
|
#1 |
Member
Sadegh Ebadi
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello everybody
May anyone read this: https://bugs.openfoam.org/view.php?id=2773 And tell me what's wrong with my case as chris mentioned there? |
|
December 4, 2017, 03:20 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Robert
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Bremen, GER
Posts: 292
Rep Power: 12 |
Point 1: The site bugs.openfoam is supposed to be used for reporting bugs and not, as in your case, questions about having problems with setting up a case. (chris 2017-11-28 19:19)
Point 2: Your case is the problem, not the software. As such you wont get support there and no one overthere will bother with your case (chris 2017-11-29 13:36) |
|
January 1, 2018, 16:21 |
|
#3 | |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings to all!
When in doubt about a bug and if you cannot hire commercial support, then you can always try asking here on the public forums. As I've indicated on the bug report: Quote:
Now, even if the objective is to speed up the simulation, jumping directly into the final case configuration is just not a good idea. This is OpenFOAM (although the same can happen with any CFD tool), you should always take small steps when creating a case, specially if you are not yet familiar with what you're doing. My first guess without looking at the case, is that the direction of the injection does not match the direction of the axis. I've now taken a look at the case... @omid20110: What exactly were you expecting when using the following entry in "sprayCloudProperties.subModels.injectionModels.mo del1": Code:
flowType pressureDrivenVelocity; If I'm interpreting this correctly, it's as if you forgot to turn on the fan and expect it to work. No wonder people were upset with your bug report Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
||
January 2, 2018, 03:07 |
|
#4 | |
Member
Sadegh Ebadi
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Thanks for replying (although it's a little bit late ) First of all I should tell that I had run the case with a full cylinder and the problem was solved! Now I'm using a 30 degree vector of that cylinder (3D case) for my simulations and again the problem is solved and I'm sure that the problem is due to using a wedge case and boundary conditions! Yes the flow type in the spray cloud properties is pressureDrivenVelocity and because of this I have specified a P_inj there! Also about this problem...One of my friends had run the 2D(wedge) case with dieselFoam and didn't face this type of problem! Last edited by wyldckat; January 2, 2018 at 06:41. Reason: merged posts 1 minute apart |
||
January 2, 2018, 06:46 |
|
#5 | ||
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Quick answers:
Quote:
Quote:
With the same injector or a different injector? And did the case have an inlet and an outlet? |
|||
January 3, 2018, 06:24 |
|
#6 | |
Member
Sadegh Ebadi
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Yes with the same injector. The case is a combustion chamber with an inlet and without any outlet. For more information you can check Sandia Spray H properties at this link: http://www.ca.sandia.gov/ecn/cvdata/...h/frameset.php I don't know what have been change in the sprayFoam compared to the dieselFoam that cause this type of problem in wedge 2d cases! |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simple channel case using cyclicAMI will not converge | cbcoutinho | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | August 4, 2015 12:28 |
Numerical error or case error? Flow in a 3D pipe | fsalvucci | OpenFOAM | 40 | January 30, 2013 07:10 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 12:24 |
what's wrong with my case?????? | zhu | FLUENT | 0 | August 2, 2006 09:58 |
Turbulent Flat Plate Validation Case | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 2, 2004 10:25 |