|
[Sponsors] |
buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam - increasing mesh density lead to underestimating results |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 23, 2018, 07:32 |
buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam - increasing mesh density lead to underestimating results
|
#1 |
Member
Ahmad Habib
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Aleppo, Syria
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello foamers
I'm trying to simulate a non-isothermal flow in a room. Using buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam, I created three meshes and used kEpsilon, kOmegaSST, RSM on these meshes, but I've got confusing results. - Using the coarse mesh, the simulation overestimated the temperature profiles compared to an experimental results recorded in several locoation in the domain, even after reducing the relaxationFactors. - Using the medium mesh, the results had a good agreement with the experimental results . - BUT when I used the fine mesh, the simulation underestimated the temperature profiles even after reducing the residualsControls. The average relative errors using kEpsilon are (24.7% for coarse mesh, 6.34% for medium mesh and 18.8% for the fine mesh) I 've got the same behavior using the three turbulence models mentioned above, you can see an example in the attachment picture I've tried to find an explanation to this results, but I came up empty handed, so if any one can help I'll appreciate that very much. Regads. |
|
Tags |
mesh study |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 07:38 |
Mesh Convergence Study - simpleFoam: Confusing Results | Karpfen | OpenFOAM | 0 | February 5, 2018 07:34 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 06:20 |
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation | Doginal | CFX | 2 | January 12, 2014 06:21 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |