|
[Sponsors] |
Are small bounding k values (order 1E-08) safe? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 22, 2018, 23:58 |
Are small bounding k values (order 1E-08) safe?
|
#1 |
Member
Anonymous
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi,
It is very common for non-orthogonal meshes to fail in maintaining the bounded values of turbulent scalars (k, omega, epsilon etc) on the faces of of two non-orthogonal neighbor cells. Usually, depending upon the severity of non-orthogonality the following scenarios arise: 1) If Max. non-orthogonality < 60, the turbulence fields don't blow up usually. 2) If 70 > Max. non-orthogonality > 60, the turbulence fields will go haywire, and usage of nonOrthoCorrectors in the solver is advised to be increased . 3) If Max. non-orthogonality >> 70, then one needs to use limited discretization schemes to achieve stability or even revisit the mesh. Now, that being said, I have an issue similar to point 1) above. My max non-orthogonality is 44 and my turbulence fields are pretty stable except for "k" which prints the bounding k warning. The avg. and max k values are quite bounded and agree with what I was expecting but I have a very small negative minimum value of k of the order of 1E-08. My simulation doesn't crash at all and the values of min k also don't change much, just oscillate between -1E-8 TO -1E-09 ish... My flow and passive scalar transport equations are pretty much converging very well. I believe it is fine to run with that small "min k" if it is not leading to divergence of the solution. What are your thoughts on this? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
can you tell me best gradient, pressure & momentum order selection in fluent | sanjiiv | FLUENT | 6 | February 14, 2020 06:07 |
SIMPLE algorithm does not converge when using old pressure (correction) values | andreasp | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 9, 2016 21:18 |
2nd Order Convergence Problem for 3D Airfoil | turkmengokce | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | September 10, 2015 07:20 |
Convergence in Fluent at small (order 1) Re | Sergei Chernyshenko | FLUENT | 0 | January 10, 2008 05:39 |
1st order temporal & 2nd order spatial | Prateep Chatterjee | FLUENT | 0 | January 19, 2003 00:31 |