CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Are small bounding k values (order 1E-08) safe?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 22, 2018, 23:58
Default Are small bounding k values (order 1E-08) safe?
  #1
Member
 
Anonymous
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 9
backscatter is on a distinguished road
Hi,


It is very common for non-orthogonal meshes to fail in maintaining the bounded values of turbulent scalars (k, omega, epsilon etc) on the faces of of two non-orthogonal neighbor cells. Usually, depending upon the severity of non-orthogonality the following scenarios arise:
1) If Max. non-orthogonality < 60, the turbulence fields don't blow up usually.
2) If 70 > Max. non-orthogonality > 60, the turbulence fields will go haywire, and usage of nonOrthoCorrectors in the solver is advised to be increased .
3) If Max. non-orthogonality >> 70, then one needs to use limited discretization schemes to achieve stability or even revisit the mesh.

Now, that being said, I have an issue similar to point 1) above. My max non-orthogonality is 44 and my turbulence fields are pretty stable except for "k" which prints the bounding k warning. The avg. and max k values are quite bounded and agree with what I was expecting but I have a very small negative minimum value of k of the order of 1E-08. My simulation doesn't crash at all and the values of min k also don't change much, just oscillate between -1E-8 TO -1E-09 ish... My flow and passive scalar transport equations are pretty much converging very well.
I believe it is fine to run with that small "min k" if it is not leading to divergence of the solution. What are your thoughts on this?
backscatter is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
can you tell me best gradient, pressure & momentum order selection in fluent sanjiiv FLUENT 6 February 14, 2020 06:07
SIMPLE algorithm does not converge when using old pressure (correction) values andreasp Main CFD Forum 3 February 9, 2016 21:18
2nd Order Convergence Problem for 3D Airfoil turkmengokce OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 September 10, 2015 07:20
Convergence in Fluent at small (order 1) Re Sergei Chernyshenko FLUENT 0 January 10, 2008 05:39
1st order temporal & 2nd order spatial Prateep Chatterjee FLUENT 0 January 19, 2003 00:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:11.