|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Ruiyan Chen
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Hangzhou, China
Posts: 162
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Recently I've been looking into the k-epsilon model in OpenFOAM, and quite confused based on what is shown here https://www.openfoam.com/documentati...k-epsilon.html.
In the above link, it says the standard k-epsilon model solves the transport equations of k and epsilon as shown in the StandardkEpsilon.png figure, while OpenFOAM solves the ones shown in the OpenFOAMkEpsilon.png figure. I noticed that the standard one is also used by ANSYS Fluent. For constant density flows without buoyancy forces, Gb in the k equation from the standard k-epsilon model vanishes, and div(u) = 0. The two forms of the k-epsilon model are exactly the same. However, for variable density flows without buoyancy forces, although Gb goes away, div(u) is in general not equal to 0. Does this suggest that Fluent will give a wrong solution but OpenFOAM will produce a right one because it explicitly takes into account effects of the variable density? Thanks in advance. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
compressible, k-epsilon model |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFOAM v3.0+ ?? | SBusch | OpenFOAM | 22 | December 26, 2016 14:24 |
Blow of compressible solver while using K-epsilon model in openfoam | Amit Mathur | OpenFOAM | 16 | October 6, 2013 11:09 |
OpenFOAM: LES turbulence model names | Ollie | OpenFOAM | 5 | January 7, 2013 10:24 |
New OpenFOAM Forum Structure | jola | OpenFOAM | 2 | October 19, 2011 06:55 |
OpenFOAM: LES turbulence model names | Ollie | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 11, 2011 13:03 |