|
[Sponsors] |
Rough wall function vs. atmospheric rough wall function |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 23, 2015, 06:30 |
Rough wall function vs. atmospheric rough wall function
|
#1 |
New Member
Josh
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12 |
I have been looking into homogeneity of atmospheric boundary layer profiles through an empty fetch. I noticed that nutkAtmRoughWallFunction performed slightly worse than nutkRoughWallFunction.
When looking at the code to work out what the atmospheric version was doing, I came across a definition I can't work out: As expected, both define effective viscosity as: For nutkRoughWallFunction, E' is defined as expected, based on roughness regime. For fully rough (most practical ABL applications), it's: However, for the nutkAtmRoughWallFunction, it is defined as: . I've not seen this definition in the literature, and can't work out why it's used. It means that the sand grain roughness is never defined in the equation, which seems odd. Can anyone shed any light on this? |
|
Tags |
boundary layer, k-epsilon, wall functions |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] refineWallLayer Error | Yuby | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | November 11, 2021 11:04 |
[blockMesh] Errors during blockMesh meshing | Madeleine P. Vincent | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 51 | May 30, 2016 10:51 |
Standard wall function - breakdown - rough wall | Marsoup | FLUENT | 0 | August 1, 2014 16:13 |
Error with Wmake | skabilan | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | July 28, 2009 00:35 |
Problem with rhoSimpleFoam | matteo_gautero | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 28, 2008 06:51 |