|
[Sponsors] |
August 10, 2020, 07:58 |
|
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: France
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
For the y+ I used a post processing command line to run after the end of the solver. mpirun -np 12 buoyantSimpleFoam -postProcess -latestTime -func yPlus You can also declare the resolution of the yPlus in the controlDict file to run it automatically : yPlus { type yPlus; libs (fieldFunctionObjects); // v1912, it has been changed regarding the version writeControl writeTime; writeControl timeStep; writeInterval 100; } For the nut, k, omega ... I found that the guy which created the tutorial buoyantCavity (buoyantSimpleFoam), use the mean root square of the velocity (Urms in the publication) measured by Betts et al. (P.L. Betts, I.H. Bokhari / Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 21 (2000) 675±683) Experiments on turbulent natural convection in an enclosed tall cavity. In the publication they did not say how they calculate/measured this term. I do not know if everyone is doing this or there is an alternative way for natural convection case. Cheers. Last edited by john myce; August 11, 2020 at 06:36. |
||
Tags |
buoyantboussinesqsimple, natural convection |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Natural convection regime in a small cavity | AntonioDesah | FLUENT | 7 | May 5, 2020 07:48 |
Natural convection regime in a small cavity | AntonioDesah | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 29, 2020 13:45 |
SU2-7.0.1 on ubuntu 18.04 | hyunko | SU2 Installation | 7 | March 16, 2020 04:37 |
UDF for body force for rotating cavity with natural convection | s.jaiswal | FLUENT | 0 | February 18, 2014 02:01 |
Natural Convection Problem | Eduardo | FLUENT | 0 | October 21, 2006 14:04 |