CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

rhoPimpleFoam vs. rhoCentralFoam

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By jnanabrao

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 2, 2023, 08:01
Default rhoPimpleFoam vs. rhoCentralFoam
  #1
New Member
 
William
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Sir.Walkington is on a distinguished road
Hello,
at the moment i am investigating the differences of pressure-based vs. density-based solvers for subsonic flows. I am testing on the Axisymmetric subsonic Jet from NASA:
https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/jetsubsonic_val.html
This case has a speed of ca. 0.5Ma, so i think a interesting point to investigate between pressure and density based.
I managed to set up the rhoPimpleFoam Case and get decent results. However the rhoCentralFoam is giving me Headaches. I am getting wildly diffrent results and dont quite understand why. I realize that the pressure-based solver should probably perform better at such a small Mach-number, but i just don't think it should perform this badly. I attached two screenshots from paraView and both of the cases, without the time folders and mesh because of size reasons. Maybe someone is interested in this and could take a look.


Cheers !
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CentralFoam.jpg (24.3 KB, 36 views)
File Type: jpg PimpeFoam.jpg (23.6 KB, 31 views)
Attached Files
File Type: zip PimplevsCentral.zip (33.9 KB, 8 views)
Sir.Walkington is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2023, 03:51
Default
  #2
Member
 
Jnana Bhaskar Rao
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 6
jnanabrao is on a distinguished road
rhoCentralFoam is typically very dissipative. I have experience with it in LES calculations for Mach 2 jet and I find sonicFoam to be more accurate at the same mesh resolution, albeit it requires a lot of inner and outer correctors leading to higher computational cost. You must try rhoCentralFoam with different interpolation schemes (vanLeer or Gamma), different divSchemes for turbulence quantities (other than upwind), and try running it without a turbulence model with laminar setting to see if there is any change. But I would suggest refine your mesh further and see if you see any improvements in rhoCentralFoam results as eventually it may just be a question of dissipation. You can also try the rhoEnergyFoam solver that was developed independently (I'm sure you can find the source code with a google search and compile it if you have installed OF with source code).
hogsonik likes this.
jnanabrao is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
density based, pressure based, rhocentrafoam, rhopimplefoam

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
forwardStep tutorial case: failure in OpenFOAM-dev using rhoPimpleFoam RobertC OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 June 17, 2023 11:29
Modify rhoCentralFoam: other equations of state fivos OpenFOAM Programming & Development 5 July 29, 2020 13:17
Question about rhoCentralFoam and rhoPimpleFoam? iLyrics OpenFOAM 6 December 10, 2016 07:57
Pressure stair-step behaviour using rhopimplefoam joegi.geo OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 December 12, 2014 12:10
is sonicFoam better in convergence than rhoPimplefoam or rhoCentralFoam? immortality OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 February 11, 2013 22:26


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:30.