|
[Sponsors] | |||||
simpleFoam and rhoSimpleFoam boundary conditions |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
prab
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hello, I am a newbie to openfoam. After going though the tutorials, I am setting up a capillary gas flow where the inlet is at atmospheric pressure 101325 pascal and the outlet is at 300 pascal.
I know that the incomprssible simpleFoam use p/rho and compressible use absolute pressure. But I am not sure if the p and U settings I entered are correct. The simulation is running somehow, but I do not see mach cones, which are expected at the outlet of the capillary. It looks like a simple gas expansion. So I am worried about the boundary settings. Following are the boundary setting for simpleFoam and rhoSimpleFoam. simpleFoam U: Code:
dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform (0 0 0);
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0.7);
}
outlet
{
type inletOutlet;;
inletValue uniform (0 0 0.7);
}
walls
{
type noSlip;
}
}
simpleFoam p: Code:
dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform 216; //260/1.2;
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}
outlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 216; //260/1.2;
}
walls
{
type zeroGradient;
}
}
rhoSimpleFoam U: Code:
dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform (0 0 0);
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type flowRateInletVelocity;
massFlowRate constant 0.5; //I have a mesurement of mass flow rate //1.2 L/min. But just to test the code I used the default 0.5.
rhoInlet 0.5; // Guess for rho
profile turbulentBL;
}
outlet
{
type pressureInletOutletVelocity;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
walls
{
type noSlip;
}
}
Code:
dimensions [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform 260;
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type zeroGradient;
refValue uniform 101325;
refGradient uniform 0;
valueFraction uniform 0.3;
}
outlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 260;
}
walls
{
type zeroGradient;
}
}
Any comments on if the mach cones will be visible with simpleFoam or rhoSimpleFoam? Thank you Last edited by aneps; May 22, 2023 at 18:46. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| rhosimplefoam, simple foam |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| simpleFoam and rhoSimpleFoam convergence problem | maem93 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 6, 2017 07:42 |
| compressible flow, rhoSimpleFoam, boundary conditions | Aeronautics El. K. | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | June 26, 2016 15:27 |
| Switching from simpleFoam to rhoSimpleFoam | sebastian | OpenFOAM | 11 | January 7, 2015 05:32 |
| SimpleFoam results as initial condition to rhoSimpleFoam | marcelorl | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 5 | March 7, 2014 11:08 |
| Dimesion error after switching from simpleFoam to rhoSimpleFoam | sebastian | OpenFOAM Bugs | 2 | June 17, 2010 09:03 |