CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

simpleFoam and rhoSimpleFoam boundary conditions

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 22, 2023, 13:00
Default simpleFoam and rhoSimpleFoam boundary conditions
  #1
New Member
 
prab
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4
aneps is on a distinguished road
Hello, I am a newbie to openfoam. After going though the tutorials, I am setting up a capillary gas flow where the inlet is at atmospheric pressure 101325 pascal and the outlet is at 300 pascal.

I know that the incomprssible simpleFoam use p/rho and compressible use absolute pressure. But I am not sure if the p and U settings I entered are correct. The simulation is running somehow, but I do not see mach cones, which are expected at the outlet of the capillary. It looks like a simple gas expansion. So I am worried about the boundary settings. Following are the boundary setting for simpleFoam and rhoSimpleFoam.

simpleFoam U:

Code:
dimensions      [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];

internalField   uniform (0 0 0);

boundaryField
{
    inlet
    {
        type            fixedValue;
        value           uniform (0 0 0.7);
    }

    outlet
    {
        type            inletOutlet;;
        inletValue           uniform (0 0 0.7);

    }

    walls
    {
        type            noSlip;
    }

 
}

simpleFoam p:

Code:
dimensions      [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];

internalField   uniform 216; //260/1.2;

boundaryField
{
    inlet
    {
        type            zeroGradient;
    }

    outlet
    {

        type            fixedValue;
        value           uniform 216; //260/1.2;
        
    }

    walls
    {
        type            zeroGradient;
    }

  
}

rhoSimpleFoam U:

Code:
dimensions      [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];

internalField   uniform (0 0 0);

boundaryField
{
    inlet
    {
        type            flowRateInletVelocity;
        massFlowRate    constant 0.5; //I have a mesurement of mass flow rate //1.2 L/min. But just to test the code I used the default 0.5.
        rhoInlet        0.5;    // Guess for rho
        profile         turbulentBL;
    }

    outlet
    {

        type            pressureInletOutletVelocity;
        value           uniform (0 0 0);
    }

    walls
    {
        type            noSlip;
    }

 
}
rhoSimpleFoam p:

Code:
dimensions      [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0];

internalField   uniform 260; 

boundaryField
{
    inlet
    {
        type            zeroGradient;

        refValue        uniform 101325;
        refGradient     uniform 0;
        valueFraction   uniform 0.3;
    }

    outlet
    {

        type            fixedValue;
        value           uniform 260;
        
    }

    walls
    {
        type            zeroGradient;
    }

  
}
Can anyone please check if this boundary conditions are correct (atmosperic pressure inlet and 300 Pa outlet).

Any comments on if the mach cones will be visible with simpleFoam or rhoSimpleFoam?

Thank you

Last edited by aneps; May 22, 2023 at 17:46.
aneps is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
rhosimplefoam, simple foam


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
simpleFoam and rhoSimpleFoam convergence problem maem93 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 November 6, 2017 06:42
compressible flow, rhoSimpleFoam, boundary conditions Aeronautics El. K. OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 June 26, 2016 14:27
Switching from simpleFoam to rhoSimpleFoam sebastian OpenFOAM 11 January 7, 2015 04:32
SimpleFoam results as initial condition to rhoSimpleFoam marcelorl OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 5 March 7, 2014 10:08
Dimesion error after switching from simpleFoam to rhoSimpleFoam sebastian OpenFOAM Bugs 2 June 17, 2010 08:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29.