
[Sponsors] 
October 11, 2023, 09:29 
Result of Backward Facing step

#1 
New Member
seohee Jang
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3 
Dear community
I am doing the simulation of Backward Facing step with different Reynolds number. However, no matter what I change the value of Re number by changing the velocity (same step size, only different is inlet velocity), the simulation result are same except the magnitude of velocity. For example, suppose inlet U is 0.5, the max U becomes 0.5, but if inlet U is 5, max U becomes 5 like this I thought the reattachment point should be different depending on the Re number I use the kepsilon RAS model with steady state condition test with Re 5600 to 56000, Do you have any idea what is the reason for it?? I mean are there any limitation point for Reynolds number that fixed the length of Reattachment point? Best Seohee 

October 11, 2023, 09:48 

#2 
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 640
Rep Power: 13 
It's probably because you are using the standard (high Re) kepsilon model with the standard (hiRe) wall function ... these models are not Renumber dependent, so it makes sense that your solution does not change.


October 11, 2023, 10:37 

#3 
New Member
seohee Jang
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3 
Dear Tobermory
Thank you for fast replying but I don't know why the model is independent for Re number since it has the Re term in the k and epsilon equation in terms of kinematic viscosity. Best Seohee 

October 11, 2023, 11:21 

#4 
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 640
Rep Power: 13 
The only terms with viscosity in the k and eps equations are the diffusion terms, and for these the turbulent diffusion is probably orders of magnitude higher than the molecular diffusion  try calculating it and comparing. This means that the model is behaving in a highRe asymptotic limit, as is its purpose/design.
If you want to explore Re number effects, then you need to start using models that attempt to represent the low Re effects ... in both the closure model AND the wall function. Just using standard keps and standard wall function won't work. Good luck. PS  it also worth checking that there actually IS some Re# variation for your test case at the Re numbers you are simulating ... is there experimental data you can validate against? 

October 11, 2023, 13:13 

#5 
New Member
seohee Jang
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3 
Thank you Tobermory
I understand what you said the things that I want to check can be captured when the Re number effect is included in the model. And unfortunately I don't have experimental data that can validate but some of the literature which include different Re number for Backward facing step provides different position of reattachment effect I will try the other model to check it Thank you for giving me an advice for this problem Best Seohee 

October 11, 2023, 13:35 

#6  
Senior Member
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,267
Rep Power: 33 
Can you post contour plot of velocity. Your behaviour of velocity seems very strange.
Quote:


October 11, 2023, 14:21 

#7 
New Member
seohee Jang
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3 
Hi arjun
when I do the plot in case of Re 1000 and compare with Re 10000 or the other cases it shows that there are some difference for recirculation point or reattachment point However, once the Re becomes more than some limitation such as 5600, the further Re case shows similar flow dynamics I think that is because the turbulent diffusion is more dominant when Re becomes increase so that it cannot capture low Re phenomena Best Seohee 

October 12, 2023, 02:16 

#8  
Senior Member
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,267
Rep Power: 33 
The reason why i wanted to see the contour plot is that the behaviour is similar to full slip flow. In this case you max velocity would likely to be what your inlet velocity is.
This will be the case when shear stress at wall is almost zero or zero. so now that i can not see the plot, i leave you to judge this yourself. Quote:


Tags 
backwardfacing step, kepsilon model 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Backward facing step; x/H; U/U0; diemsionless analysis; paraview  idrama  OpenFOAM  1  December 3, 2013 18:10 
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam  gooya_kabir  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  2  November 2, 2013 14:58 
backward facing step simple with no particle  saeed115  Mesh Generation & PreProcessing  0  March 5, 2013 18:41 
Could anybody help me see this error and give help  liugx212  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  3  January 4, 2006 19:07 
backward facing step problem  YungMing Chen  Main CFD Forum  3  May 11, 1999 23:04 