|
[Sponsors] |
Showing that the y+ in LES simulation is valid |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 15, 2023, 16:47 |
Showing that the y+ in LES simulation is valid
|
#1 |
New Member
Marcus
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 4 |
Hi all,
I am using WALE LES to investigate a partially porous airfoil with periodic boundary conditions in the spanwise direction. To reduce computational time and to confirm y+ near the walls, I am using k-w SST model to initialize the solution. My y+ is mostly less than 1 (there are a few difficult cells with y+~1.5 in regions that are not as important for flow separation), however I am curious on whether this is sufficient to claim that the mesh will produce an accurate simulation. In the literature for similar papers, I found that they verified their mesh by repeating their simulation with a slightly higher and lower y+ up till some non-dimensional time. Unfortunately, this is not possible for me as it would take too long, and resources needs to be diverted to other simulations. So my question is, what is the best way to show that my y+ is good enough for my LES simulation? Thanks for your help, Marcus |
|
Tags |
airfoil, les, mesh, yplus |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Specifying BC for LES simulation of pollutant dispersion problem in environment | jzuzul | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | June 21, 2018 08:21 |
LES simulation - Not able to bring down M value of every cell below 0.1 | shettysds | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | February 7, 2018 20:39 |
Validation of the accuracy of LES simulation | sidharath | Main CFD Forum | 7 | January 27, 2018 19:54 |
2D LES simulation of turbulent jet | adnan.nweilati | FLUENT | 6 | December 3, 2014 10:33 |
2D LES simulation of turbulent jet | adnan.nweilati | FLUENT | 0 | November 12, 2014 11:50 |