|
[Sponsors] |
Brownian motion force calculation issue in OpenFoam |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 30, 2024, 16:16 |
Brownian motion force calculation issue in OpenFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3 |
The Brownian force (https://cpp.openfoam.org/v11/Brownia...8C_source.html) is said to be calculated as in Ahmadi et. al (https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829208959550), as
. The force is then added to the list of forces acting on a particle (as an explicit contribution) as , where is the mass of the particle. The sum of forces gives the net force, which is then integrated to obtain the new particle position. The article states, that the Brownian motion force should be varying through the timestep, as shown here: https://bugs.openfoam.org/file_downl...=1616&type=bug, whereas in case of current implementation, it is clearly constant for each timestep. Moreover, tracking the time evolution of the RMS displacement of particles, given by gives a wrong result; time evolution is obtained, instead of as shown in theory (Ahmadi). This phenomena most likely stems from the fact that Brownian force is calculated and added to the sum of all forces just like any other force (drag, lift, ...), which is most likely incorrect. A thought on this matter from anyone will be greatly appreciated. |
|
Tags |
brownian force, openfoam 11 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFOAM on AWS Ubuntu EC2 Instance | mcc12 | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | October 28, 2021 13:22 |
OpenFOAM course for beginners | Jibran | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 2 | November 4, 2019 08:51 |
OpenFOAM Training Jan-Jul 2017, Virtual, London, Houston, Berlin | CFDFoundation | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 0 | January 4, 2017 06:15 |
Force calculation in OpenFoam | dmaz | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | April 2, 2015 03:58 |
New OpenFOAM Forum Structure | jola | OpenFOAM | 2 | October 19, 2011 06:55 |